Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23596234›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Validation of a fluorescence in situ hybridization method using peptide nucleic acid probes for detection of Helicobacter pylori clarithromycin resistance in gastric biopsy specimens.

Laura Cerqueira, Ricardo M Fernandes, Rui M Ferreira, Mónica Oleastro, Fátima Carneiro, Catarina Brandão, Pedro Pimentel-Nunes, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Céu Figueiredo, Charles W Keevil and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. CurrentJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ecology ofBiofilm · 2024
    Review
  7. Molecular tools of antibiotic resistance forFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Evolution of Diagnostic Methods forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Microfluidics combined with fluorescenceFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Trends inMicrobial genomics · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Rapid identification ofThe journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura CerqueiraIBB-Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Ricardo M Fernandes
Rui M Ferreira
Mónica Oleastro
Fátima Carneiro
Catarina Brandão
Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Céu Figueiredo
Charles W Keevil
Maria J Vieira
Nuno F Azevedo
Universidade do Porto · PTInstitute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering · PTInstituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTNational Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge · PTUniversity of Minho · PTUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we evaluated a previously established peptide nucleic acid-fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) method as a new diagnostic test for Helicobacter pylori clarithromycin resistance detection in paraffin-embedded gastric biopsy specimens. Both a retrospective study and a prospective cohort study were conducted to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of a PNA-FISH method to determine H. pylori clarithromycin resistance. In the retrospective study (n = 30 patients), full agreement between PNA-FISH and PCR-sequencing was observed. Compared to the reference method (culture followed by Etest), the specificity and sensitivity of PNA-FISH were 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.1% to 99.5%) and 84.2% (95% CI, 59.5% to 95.8%), respectively. In the prospective cohort (n = 93 patients), 21 cases were positive by culture. For the patients harboring clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori, the method showed sensitivity of 80.0% (95% CI, 29.9% to 98.9%) and specificity of 93.8% (95% CI, 67.7% to 99.7%). These values likely represent underestimations, as some of the discrepant results corresponded to patients infected by more than one strain. PNA-FISH appears to be a simple, quick, and accurate method for detecting H. pylori clarithromycin resistance in paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens. It is also the only one of the methods assessed here that allows direct and specific visualization of this microorganism within the biopsy specimens, a characteristic that allowed the observation that cells of different H. pylori strains can subsist in very close proximity in the stomach.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialPeptide Nucleic AcidsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiopsyClarithromycinCohort StudiesGastric MucosaHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOligonucleotide ProbesProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinOligonucleotide ProbesPeptide Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID23596234
PMCPMC3716114
OpenAlexW2116350286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.