ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2013
What do patients think about year-end resident continuity clinic handoffs? A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Transforming the Transfer of Care: The Need for More Evidence‑Based Handoffs in Psychiatry Residency.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026Article
- Impact of an Educational Comic to Enhance Patient-Physician-Electronic Health Record Engagement: Prospective Observational Study.JMIR human factors · 2021Article
- Importance of Communication and Relationships: Addressing Disparities in Hospitalizations for African-American Patients in Academic Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- Disparities in Quality of Primary Care by Resident and Staff Physicians: Is There a Conflict Between Training and Equity?Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
- Year-End Clinic Handoffs: A National Survey of Academic Internal Medicine Programs.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Article
- Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Article
- Transitions of Care in Continuity Clinic--Lessons Learned and Next Steps.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
- Residents' final transition: the graduation clinic hand-off.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
- "Ms. B changes doctors": using a comic and patient transition packet to engineer patient-oriented clinic handoffs (EPOCH).Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
- Optimizing handoff training and outcomes in medical education.Journal of general internal medicine · 2013Article
- Developing a Virtual Teach-To-GoalThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough Internal Medicine year-end resident clinic handoffs affect numerous patients, little research has described patients' perspectives of the experience.
objectiveTo describe patients' perceptions of positive and negative experiences pertaining to the year-end clinic handoff; to rate patient satisfaction with aspects of the clinic handoff and identify whether or not patients could name their new physicians.
designQualitative study design using semi-structured interviews.
participantsHigh-risk patients who underwent a year-end clinic handoff in July 2011. MEASUREMENTS: Three months post-handoff, telephone interviews were conducted with patients to elicit their perceptions of positive and negative experiences. An initial coding classification was developed and applied to transcripts. Patients were also asked to name their primary care physician (PCP) and rate their satisfaction with the handoff.
resultsIn all, 103 telephone interviews were completed. Patient experiences regarding clinic handoffs were categorized into four themes: (1) doctor-patient relationships (i.e. difficulty building rapport); (2) clinic logistics (i.e. difficulty rescheduling appointments); (3) process of the care transition (i.e. patient unaware transition occurred); and (4) patient safety-related issues (i.e. missed tests). Only 59 % of patients could correctly name their new PCP. Patients who reported that they were informed of the clinic transition by letter or by telephone call from their new PCP were more likely to correctly name them (65 % vs. 32 % p = 0.007), report that their new doctor assumed care for them immediately (81 % [68/84] vs. 53 % [10/19], p = 0.009) and report satisfaction with communication between their old and new doctors (80 % [67/84] vs. 58 % [11/19], p = 0.04). Patients reported positive experiences such as learning more about their new physician through personal sharing, which helped them build rapport. Patients who reported being aware of the medical education mission of the clinic tended to be more understanding of the handoff process.
conclusionsPatients face unique challenges during year-end clinic handoffs and provide insights into areas of improvement for a patient-centered handoff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.