Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23595932›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2013

What do patients think about year-end resident continuity clinic handoffs? A qualitative study.

Amber T Pincavage, Wei Wei Lee, Kimberly J Beiting, Vineet M Arora

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Transforming the Transfer of Care: The Need for More Evidence‑Based Handoffs in Psychiatry Residency.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Residents' final transition: the graduation clinic hand-off.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Optimizing handoff training and outcomes in medical education.Journal of general internal medicine · 2013
    Article
  12. Developing a Virtual Teach-To-GoalThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amber T PincavageDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue MC 3051, L326, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. apincava@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Wei Wei Lee
Kimberly J Beiting
Vineet M Arora
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough Internal Medicine year-end resident clinic handoffs affect numerous patients, little research has described patients' perspectives of the experience.

objectiveTo describe patients' perceptions of positive and negative experiences pertaining to the year-end clinic handoff; to rate patient satisfaction with aspects of the clinic handoff and identify whether or not patients could name their new physicians.

designQualitative study design using semi-structured interviews.

participantsHigh-risk patients who underwent a year-end clinic handoff in July 2011. MEASUREMENTS: Three months post-handoff, telephone interviews were conducted with patients to elicit their perceptions of positive and negative experiences. An initial coding classification was developed and applied to transcripts. Patients were also asked to name their primary care physician (PCP) and rate their satisfaction with the handoff.

resultsIn all, 103 telephone interviews were completed. Patient experiences regarding clinic handoffs were categorized into four themes: (1) doctor-patient relationships (i.e. difficulty building rapport); (2) clinic logistics (i.e. difficulty rescheduling appointments); (3) process of the care transition (i.e. patient unaware transition occurred); and (4) patient safety-related issues (i.e. missed tests). Only 59 % of patients could correctly name their new PCP. Patients who reported that they were informed of the clinic transition by letter or by telephone call from their new PCP were more likely to correctly name them (65 % vs. 32 % p = 0.007), report that their new doctor assumed care for them immediately (81 % [68/84] vs. 53 % [10/19], p = 0.009) and report satisfaction with communication between their old and new doctors (80 % [67/84] vs. 58 % [11/19], p = 0.04). Patients reported positive experiences such as learning more about their new physician through personal sharing, which helped them build rapport. Patients who reported being aware of the medical education mission of the clinic tended to be more understanding of the handoff process.

conclusionsPatients face unique challenges during year-end clinic handoffs and provide insights into areas of improvement for a patient-centered handoff.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchContinuity of Patient CareHumansInternship and ResidencyPatient HandoffPatient Safety

Identifiers

PMID23595932
PMCPMC3710383
OpenAlexW1973659248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.