ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2013
Extending the conditions of application of an inversion of the Hodgkin-Huxley gating model.
Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generation of biophysical neuron model parameters from recorded electrophysiological responses.eLife · 2025Article
- Neural Network Differential Equations For Ion Channel Modelling.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
- Accounting for variability in ion current recordings using a mathematical model of artefacts in voltage-clamp experiments.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020Article
- Validation and Trustworthiness of Multiscale Models of Cardiac Electrophysiology.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
- Uncertainty and variability in computational and mathematical models of cardiac physiology.The Journal of physiology · 2016Article
- Estimability Analysis and Optimal Design in Dynamic Multi-scale Models of Cardiac Electrophysiology.Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an inversion of the Hodgkin-Huxley formalism to estimate initial conditions and model parameters, including functions of voltage, from the solutions of the underlying ordinary differential equation (ODE) subjected to multiple voltage step stimulations. As such, the procedure constitutes a means to estimate the parameters including functions of voltage of an Hodgkin-Huxley formalism from experimental data.The basic idea was developed in a previous communication (SIAM J. Appl. Math. 64:1264-1274, 2009). The inversion in question applies to currents exhibiting activation and inactivation, but the version, as published previously, cannot estimate the unknowns for channels that rapidly inactivate just after a brief opening. In such cases, the amplitude of the current, in a given voltage range, is too small to be detectable by the instrumentation using previously applied experimental protocols. This is, for example, the case for the sodium channels in a number of excitable tissue for potential in the vicinity of the cell resting potential. The current communication extends the inversion procedure in a manner to overcome this limitation.Furthermore, within the inversion framework, we can determine whether the data at the basis of the estimation sufficiently constrains the estimation problem, i.e., whether it is complete. We exploit this element of our method to document a set of stimulation protocols that constitute a complete data set for the purpose of inverting the Hodgkin-Huxley formalism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.