Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23595750›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

A dynamic deep sleep stage in Drosophila.

Bart van Alphen, Melvyn H W Yap, Leonie Kirszenblat, Benjamin Kottler, Bruno van Swinderen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 259 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nighttime sleep promotes mechanosensory habituation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Inferring the genetic basis of sleep states inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current Evidence for Sleep States inCurrent sleep medicine reports · 2026
    Review
  11. 25 years ofFly · 2025
    Review
  12. Recognition of distinct sleep states inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. The exploration of consciousness in insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Royal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bart van AlphenQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Melvyn H W Yap
Leonie Kirszenblat
Benjamin Kottler
Bruno van Swinderen
University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Functional Analysis of Sleep Promoting Neurons in Health and DiseaseR01NS076980 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHAW, PAUL J · 2011 to 2020
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How might one determine whether simple animals such as flies sleep in stages? Sleep in mammals is a dynamic process involving different stages of sleep intensity, and these are typically associated with measurable changes in brain activity (Blake and Gerard, 1937; Rechtschaffen and Kales, 1968; Webb and Agnew, 1971). Evidence for different sleep stages in invertebrates remains elusive, even though it has been well established that many invertebrate species require sleep (Campbell and Tobler, 1984; Hendricks et al., 2000; Shaw et al., 2000; Sauer et al., 2003). Here we used electrophysiology and arousal-testing paradigms to show that the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, transitions between deeper and lighter sleep within extended bouts of inactivity, with deeper sleep intensities after ∼15 and ∼30 min of inactivity. As in mammals, the timing and intensity of these dynamic sleep processes in flies is homeostatically regulated and modulated by behavioral experience. Two molecules linked to synaptic plasticity regulate the intensity of the first deep sleep stage. Optogenetic upregulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate during the day increases sleep intensity at night, whereas loss of function of a molecule involved in synaptic pruning, the fragile-X mental retardation protein, increases sleep intensity during the day. Our results show that sleep is not homogenous in insects, and suggest that waking behavior and the associated synaptic plasticity mechanisms determine the timing and intensity of deep sleep stages in Drosophila.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsAdenylyl CyclasesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBrainCREB-Binding ProteinDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsELAV ProteinsElectronic Data ProcessingEvoked PotentialsFemaleFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Gene Expression RegulationLocomotionMaleAdenylyl CyclasesCREB-Binding ProteinDrosophila ProteinsELAV protein, DrosophilaELAV ProteinsFMR1 protein, DrosophilaFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Tm2 protein, DrosophilaTropomyosin

Identifiers

PMID23595750
PMCPMC3670110
OpenAlexW2015738937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.