Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23595613›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastroenterology2014

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, healing effect of rebamipide in patients with low-dose aspirin and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced small bowel injury.

Sei Kurokawa, Shinichi Katsuki, Tomoki Fujita, Yusuke Saitoh, Hidetoshi Ohta, Kouji Nishikawa, Yasushi Sato, Yasuhiro Sato, Koji Ohira, Masataka Yamada and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. NSAID-Gut Microbiota Interactions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the gut microbiome.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Sei KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sapporo-Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Shinichi Katsuki
Tomoki Fujita
Yusuke Saitoh
Hidetoshi Ohta
Kouji Nishikawa
Yasushi Sato
Yasuhiro Sato
Koji Ohira
Masataka Yamada
Mototsugu Kato
Otaru Municipal Hospital · JPSapporo Medical University · JPAsahikawa City Hospital · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPMiwa Hospital · JPOtsu Municipal Hospital · JPSapporo Kosei General Hospital · JPSapporo Science Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not clear what kind of drug is appropriate to heal NSAID-induced enteropathy. Several reports showed the preventive effect of prostaglandin analogue or inducer using healthy subjects who took NSAIDs. However there was no report for healing effect and for patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the healing effect of rebamipide in patients with NSAIDs-induced enteropathy. In addition, we evaluated for nutritional parameter.

methodsThis study was conducted as a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Study protocol was approved by each hospital's ethical committees. Patients with LDA and/or NSAID more than 3 months were enrolled. Patients with enteropathy were divided into the placebo and the rebamipide groups. Rebamipide 100 mg three times daily was administered during 4 weeks. Capsule endoscopies were performed at 0 and 4 week. The number of small intestinal ulcer and erosion were evaluated. Total protein was analyzed as nutritional parameter.

resultsSixty one participants were completed this study. Change in number of small intestinal erosion in the rebamipide group was -2.5 ± 3.4, and 2.1 ± 3.9 in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). Change in number of small intestinal ulcer in the rebamipide group was -0.5 ± 1.6, and 0.1 ± 0.7 in the placebo group (P = 0.024). Change in serum total protein levels in the rebamipide group was 0.06 ± 0.36, and -0.27 ± 0.34 in the placebo group (P = 0.0005).

conclusionsRebamipide has not only the healing effect for NSAIDs-induced enteropathy compared with placebo, but the improvement of nutritional condition. These results showed a tentative therapeutical strategy for chronic NSAIDs users.

Indexed as

AgedAlanineAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnti-Ulcer AgentsAspirinCapsule EndoscopyDietary ProteinsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIntestinal DiseasesIntestinal MucosaIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedQuinolonesAlanineAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnti-Ulcer AgentsAspirinDietary ProteinsQuinolonesrebamipide

Identifiers

PMID23595613
OpenAlexW2105372886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.