ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2013
Control of bursting behavior in neurons by autaptic modulation.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autapses enhance bursting and coincidence detection in neocortical pyramidal cells.Nature communications · 2018Article
- The role of coupling strength and internal delay between compartments in shaping the bursting behavior of cortical neuron.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Firing properties of biological neurons have long been recognized to be determined by extrinsic synaptic afferents that neurons receive and intrinsic ionic mechanisms that neurons possess, however, previous researches have also demonstrated that firing behavior of single neurons can be modulated by the neurons themselves, realized by the autapses. Thus in this investigation, we argued that how autaptic modulations shape the bursting behavior of biological neurons. We considered the issue from the following two aspects: autaptic-excitation and -inhibition. Our results suggested that for autaptic-excitation, under the condition of relatively weak stimulus, regular bursting was more incline to occur when the autaptic strength was weak, while regular spiking was more likely to appear when the autaptic strength was strong. However, larger stimulus would diminish the portion of bursting, but increase the portion of spiking. For autaptic-inhibition, under relatively weak stimulus, a wide range of regular bursting emerges when the autaptic strength was small, but when stronger stimulus were applied, the range of regular bursting shrinked into a small region. Meanwhile, we observed that synaptic delays have no obvious effects in the case of autaptic-excitation, while a subtle effect of synaptic delays was observed in the case of autaptic-inhibition. These results showed that bursting behavior of neurons could be controlled and modulated by the autaptic mechanisms that biological neurons intrinsically possess, and the final results may further promote the understanding in the generation of various neuronal firing patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23595543What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.