Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23595360›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2013

Assessment of juvenile pigs to serve as human pediatric surrogates for preclinical formulation pharmacokinetic testing.

Wyatt J Roth, Candice B Kissinger, Robyn R McCain, Bruce R Cooper, Jeremy N Marchant-Forde, Rachel C Vreeman, Sophia Hannou, Gregory T Knipp

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Genetically Engineered Pigs to Study Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Engineered Swine Models of Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2016
    Review
  17. Mechanisms of synergy in polymicrobial infections.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wyatt J RothDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Candice B Kissinger
Robyn R McCain
Bruce R Cooper
Jeremy N Marchant-Forde
Rachel C Vreeman
Sophia Hannou
Gregory T Knipp
Purdue University West Lafayette · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

INDIANA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025761 · NCRR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2008 to 2011
$21.0M
NCRR NIH HHS RR025761NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric drug development is hampered by biological, clinical, and formulation challenges associated with age-based populations. A primary cause for this lack of development is the inability to accurately predict ontogenic changes that affect pharmacokinetics (PK) in children using traditional preclinical animal models. In response to this issue, our laboratory has conducted a proof-of-concept study to investigate the potential utility of juvenile pigs to serve as surrogates for children during preclinical PK testing of selected rifampin dosage forms. Pigs were surgically modified with jugular vein catheters that were externalized in the dorsal scapular region and connected to an automated blood sampling system (PigTurn-Culex-L). Commercially available rifampin capsules were administered to both 20 and 40 kg pigs to determine relevant PK parameters. Orally disintegrating tablet formulations of rifampin were also developed and administered to 20 kg pigs. Plasma samples were prepared from whole blood by centrifugation and analyzed for rifampin content by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Porcine PK parameters were determined from the resultant plasma-concentration time profiles and contrasted with published rifampin PK data in human adults and children. Results indicated significant similarities in dose-normalized absorption and elimination parameters between pigs and humans. Moreover, ontogenic changes observed in porcine PK parameters were consistent with ontogenic changes reported for human PK. These results demonstrate the potential utility of the juvenile porcine model for predicting human pediatric PK for rifampin. Furthermore, utilization of juvenile pigs during formulation testing may provide an alternative approach to expedite reformulation efforts during pediatric drug development.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAdministration, OralAge FactorsAnimalsBiomarkersChemistry, PharmaceuticalDogsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHaplorhiniHumansMiceRatsRifampinSpecies SpecificitySus scrofaBiomarkersRifampin

Identifiers

PMID23595360
PMCPMC3691418
OpenAlexW2065344333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.