Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23595235›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2013

Responding to a significant recruitment challenge within three nationwide psychoeducational trials for cancer patients.

Annette L Stanton, Marion E Morra, Michael A Diefenbach, Suzanne M Miller, Rosemarie Slevin Perocchia, Peter C Raich, Linda Fleisher, Kuang-Yi Wen, Zung Vu Tran, Nihal E Mohamed and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Minority stress, psychosocial resources, and psychological distress among sexual minority breast cancer survivors.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2017
    Article
  12. Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q: Augmentation.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Annette L StantonDepartments of Psychology and Psychiatry/Biobehavioral Sciences, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA. astanton@ucla.edu
Marion E Morra
Michael A Diefenbach
Suzanne M Miller
Rosemarie Slevin Perocchia
Peter C Raich
Linda Fleisher
Kuang-Yi Wen
Zung Vu Tran
Nihal E Mohamed
Roshini George
Mary Anne Bright
Alfred C Marcus

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
USING TAILORED MESSAGE TO INCREASE COLORECTAL SCREENINGP01CA057586 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STANTON, ANNETTE L · 1993 to 2010
$10.5M
NCI NIH HHS 5P01CA057586NCI NIH HHS P01 CA057586NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhen faced with a significant recruitment challenge for three nationwide psychoeducational trials targeting prostate and breast cancer patients, the Cancer Information Service Research Consortium initiated outreach efforts to increase accrual. Recruitment is reported by major outreach strategy to inform the use of similar campaigns, either as primary recruitment efforts or to supplement "in-reach" recruitment within oncology settings.

methodsDuring a 33-month period, recruitment was tracked from the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service (CIS), the American Cancer Society (ACS), Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation's Love/Avon Army of Women (AOW), Internet advertising, press releases, radio/television interviews, recruitment materials in community venues, and outreach to churches and cancer support organizations.

resultsAcross projects, the majority (89 %) of recruited participants (N = 2,134) was obtained from the CIS (n = 901, 19 months of recruitment), AOW (n = 869, 18 months), and ACS (n = 123, 12 months). Other efforts showed minimal gain in recruitment.

conclusionsCancer information programs (e.g., CIS and ACS) and registries of individuals willing to participate in cancer-related research (e.g., AOW) can represent exceptional resources for outreach recruitment of cancer patients, especially when the eligibility criteria are highly restrictive. However, these resources do not yield samples representative of the larger population of adults diagnosed with cancer, and conclusions from such trials must be tempered accordingly. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Inadequate recruitment to randomized controlled trials limits the creation of useful interventions for cancer survivors. By enrolling in cancer registries and taking part in research, cancer survivors can contribute to the development of effective resources for the survivor population.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionAdultBreast NeoplasmsCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInformation ServicesInternetMalePatient Education as TopicProstatic NeoplasmsResidence CharacteristicsTelevisionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23595235
PMCPMC3737366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.