Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23595223›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2013

Preoperative classification of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: the clinical significance of diagnostic inaccuracy.

Clifford S Cho, Andrew J Russ, Agnes G Loeffler, Robert J Rettammel, Gregory Oudheusden, Emily R Winslow, Sharon M Weber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04140435 (How Does the EUS-guided Through-the-needle Microforceps Biopsy Improve Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04140435 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

How Does the EUS-guided Through-the-needle Microforceps Biopsy Improve Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Multicenter Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitute of Gastroenterology and Advance EndoscopyRan2019 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsPancreatic CystArmsEUS-guided through-the-needle microbiopsy forceps (Moray)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genetic testingWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Endoscopic management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Effectiveness of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in the Differentiation of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: A Single-Center Experience.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  12. [Pancreatic cystic neoplasms].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clifford S ChoSection of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, J4/703 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, USA. cho@surgery.wisc.edu
Andrew J Russ
Agnes G Loeffler
Robert J Rettammel
Gregory Oudheusden
Emily R Winslow
Sharon M Weber
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital · US

Funding

UW Surgical Oncology Research Training Program (UW-SORT)T32CA090217 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Muhammed Murtaza, Heather B Neuman · 2001 to 2026
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential for malignant transformation varies among pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) subtypes. Imaging and cyst fluid analysis are used to identify premalignant or malignant cases that should undergo operative resection, but the accuracy of operative decision-making process is unclear. The objective of this study was to characterize misdiagnoses of PCN and determine how often operations are undertaken for benign, non-premalignant disease.

methodsA retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pancreatic resection for the preoperative diagnosis of PCN was undertaken. Preoperative and pathological diagnoses were compared to measure diagnostic accuracy.

resultsBetween 1999 and 2011, 74 patients underwent pancreatic resection for the preoperative diagnosis of PCN. Preoperative classification of mucinous vs. non-mucinous PCN was correct in 74%. The specific preoperative PCN diagnosis was correct in 47%, but half of incorrect preoperative diagnoses were clinically equivalent to the pathological diagnoses. The likelihood that the pathological diagnosis was of higher malignant potential than the preoperative diagnosis was 7%. In 20% of cases, the preoperative diagnosis was premalignant or malignant, but the pathological diagnosis was benign. Diagnostic accuracy and the rate of undercall diagnoses and overcall operations did not change with the use of EUS or during the time period of this analysis.

conclusionsPrecise, preoperative classification of PCN is frequently incorrect but results in appropriate clinical decision-making in three-quarters of cases. However, one in five pancreatic resections performed for PCN was for benign disease with no malignant potential. An appreciation for the rate of diagnostic inaccuracies should inform our operative management of PCN.

Indexed as

EndosonographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPancreatic CystPancreatic NeoplasmsPreoperative CarePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID23595223
PMCPMC4857772
OpenAlexW1986914091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.