ArticleBMC psychiatry2013
Psychiatric admissions from crisis resolution teams in Norway: a prospective multicentre study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Who Benefits from Acute Psychiatric Home Treatment? A Systematic Review.Community mental health journal · 2024Pooled it
- Factors associated with successful psychiatric intensive home treatment - a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Who Benefits from Home Treatment? Predictors of Treatment Outcome in an Acute Psychiatric Setting: an Observational Study.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Observational
- Article
- A Change of Paradigm in the Management of Acute Psychiatric Episodes? A Retrospective Cohort Study on Trajectories of Use of Clinical Resources After the Implementation of Intensive Home-Treatment.Community mental health journal · 2024Article
- Prescriptive factors for intensive home treatment in acute psychiatry: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.International journal of mental health systems · 2024Article
- Review
- Assessment of the efficacy of a Crisis Intervention Team (CIT): experience in the Esplugues Mental Health Center (Barcelona).Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2022Observational
- Similarities and differences between service users' and carers' experiences of crisis resolution teams in Norway: a survey.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Is Home Treatment for Everyone? Characteristics of Patients Receiving Intensive Mental Health Care at Home.Community mental health journal · 2022Article
- Referral for Intensive Home Treatment or Psychiatric Inpatient Care? A Retrospective, Observational Comparison of Patient and Process Characteristics.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Article
- Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- Community-based Mental Health Services in Norway.Consortium psychiatricum · 2021Review
- Police Encounters, Agitation, Diagnosis, and Employment Predict Psychiatric Hospitalisation of Intensive Home Treatment Patients During a Psychiatric Crisis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Association between clinical observations and a mobile crisis team's level of care recommendations.Community mental health journal · 2019Article
- Factors associated with involuntary hospitalisation for psychiatric patients in Switzerland: a retrospective study.BMC psychiatry · 2018Article
- The Impact of Integrating Crisis Teams into Community Mental Health Services on Emergency Department and Inpatient Demand.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCrisis resolution teams (CRTs) provide intensive alternative care to hospital admission for patients with mental health crises. The aims of this study were to describe the proportions and characteristics of patients admitted to in-patient wards from CRTs, to identify any differences in admission practices between CRTs, and to identify predictors of admissions from CRTs.
methodsA naturalistic prospective multicentre design was used to study 680 consecutive patients under the care of eight CRTs in Norway over a 3-month period in 2005/2006. Socio-demographic and clinical data were collected on the patients, and on the organization and operation of the CRTs. Logistic regression analysis for hierarchical data was used to test potential predictors of admission at team and patient level.
resultsOne hundred and forty-six patients (21.5%) were admitted to in-patient wards. There were significant differences in admission rates between the CRTs. The likelihood of being admitted to an in-patient ward was significantly lower for patients treated by CRTs that operated during extended opening hours than CRTs that operated during office hours only. Those most likely to be admitted were patients with psychotic symptoms, suicidal risk, and a prior history of admissions.
conclusionsExtended opening hours may help CRTs to prevent more admissions for patients with moderately severe and relapsing mental illnesses. Patients with severe psychosis seem to be difficult to treat in the community by Norwegian CRTs even with extended opening hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.