Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23594787›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2013

Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine with or without panitumumab for patients with previously untreated advanced oesophagogastric cancer (REAL3): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial.

Tom Waddell, Ian Chau, David Cunningham, David Gonzalez, Alicia Frances Clare Okines, Alicia Frances, Clare Okines, Andrew Wotherspoon, Claire Saffery, Gary Middleton and 12 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00824785 (REAL 3), which is not on this map. Cited by 355 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
355citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
63.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00824785 phase3terminatednot on this map

REAL 3 : A Randomised Open-labelled Multicentre Trial of the Efficacy of Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine (EOX) With or Without Panitumumab in Previously Untreated Advanced Oesophago-gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustRan2008 to 2013Enrolled574ConditionsOesophago-gastric CancerArmsepirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine (EOX), EOX + panitumumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

355 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 725 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. First-line panitumumab plus docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results of a phase II trial.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Regional differences in advanced gastric cancer: exploratory analyses of the AVAGAST placebo arm.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The density of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in oesophago-gastric cancer varies with disease stage, geographical region and treatment: a post hoc analysis of nine phase III clinical trials.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

295 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Tom WaddellThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, UK.
Ian Chau
David Cunningham
David Gonzalez
Alicia Frances Clare Okines
Alicia Frances
Clare Okines
Andrew Wotherspoon
Claire Saffery
Gary Middleton
Jonathan Wadsley
David Ferry
Wasat Mansoor
Tom Crosby
Fareeda Coxon
David Smith
Justin Waters
Timothy Iveson
Stephen Falk
Sarah Slater
Clare Peckitt
Yolanda Barbachano
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBAt Bristol · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust · GBMaidstone Hospital · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBRussells Hall Hospital · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBVelindre Cancer Centre · GBWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEGFR overexpression occurs in 27-55% of oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas, and correlates with poor prognosis. We aimed to assess addition of the anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab to epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOC) in patients with advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

methodsIn this randomised, open-label phase 3 trial (REAL3), we enrolled patients with untreated, metastatic, or locally advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma at 63 centres (tertiary referral centres, teaching hospitals, and district general hospitals) in the UK. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive up to eight 21-day cycles of open-label EOC (epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-21) or modified-dose EOC plus panitumumab (mEOC+P; epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-21, and panitumumab 9 mg/kg on day 1). Randomisation was blocked and stratified for centre region, extent of disease, and performance status. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. We assessed safety in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. After a preplanned independent data monitoring committee review in October, 2011, trial recruitment was halted and panitumumab withdrawn. Data for patients on treatment were censored at this timepoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00824785.

findingsBetween June 2, 2008, and Oct 17, 2011, we enrolled 553 eligible patients. Median overall survival in 275 patients allocated EOC was 11.3 months (95% CI 9.6-13.0) compared with 8.8 months (7.7-9.8) in 278 patients allocated mEOC+P (hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.76; p=0.013). mEOC+P was associated with increased incidence of grade 3-4 diarrhoea (48 [17%] of 276 patients allocated mEOC+P vs 29 [11%] of 266 patients allocated EOC), rash (29 [11%] vs two [1%]), mucositis (14 [5%] vs none), and hypomagnesaemia (13 [5%] vs none) but reduced incidence of haematological toxicity (grade ≥ 3 neutropenia 35 [13%] vs 74 [28%]).

interpretationAddition of panitumumab to EOC chemotherapy does not increase overall survival and cannot be recommended for use in an unselected population with advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

fundingAmgen, UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCapecitabineChi-Square DistributionDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalEarly Termination of Clinical TrialsEpirubicinErbB ReceptorsEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorCapecitabineDeoxycytidineEGFR protein, humanEpirubicinErbB ReceptorsFluorouracilOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinPanitumumabProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23594787
PMCPMC3669518
OpenAlexW2165411051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.