Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23594742›Full record

ArticleNature2013

A systematic genome-wide analysis of zebrafish protein-coding gene function.

Ross N W Kettleborough, Elisabeth M Busch-Nentwich, Steven A Harvey, Christopher M Dooley, Ewart de Bruijn, Freek van Eeden, Ian Sealy, Richard J White, Colin Herd, Isaac J Nijman and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 359 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
359citing papers in PubMed
30.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

359 citing papers in PubMed, 658 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in Fish Gene Editing.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Protective effects of roselle (Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Disruption ofThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Unravelling the developmental toxicity of heavy metals using zebrafish as a model: a narrative review.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Loss ofJBMR plus · 2025
    Article

299 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ross N W KettleboroughWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Elisabeth M Busch-Nentwich
Steven A Harvey
Christopher M Dooley
Ewart de Bruijn
Freek van Eeden
Ian Sealy
Richard J White
Colin Herd
Isaac J Nijman
Fruzsina Fényes
Selina Mehroke
Catherine Scahill
Richard Gibbons
Neha Wali
Samantha Carruthers
Amanda Hall
Jennifer Yen
Edwin Cuppen
Derek L Stemple
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBHubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Methods for Efficient Detection of Mutations in ZebrafishR01HG004819 · NHGRI · SANGER INSTITUTE · PI STEMPLE, DEREK L · 2009 to 2011
$1.0M
ETHICAL &POLICY ISSUES IN CYSTIC FIBROSIS SCREENINGR01HG000481 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HOLTZMAN, NEIL A · 1991 to 1993
–
Medical Research Council G0777791NHGRI NIH HHS 5R01HG00481NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004819Wellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the publication of the human reference genome, the identities of specific genes associated with human diseases are being discovered at a rapid rate. A central problem is that the biological activity of these genes is often unclear. Detailed investigations in model vertebrate organisms, typically mice, have been essential for understanding the activities of many orthologues of these disease-associated genes. Although gene-targeting approaches and phenotype analysis have led to a detailed understanding of nearly 6,000 protein-coding genes, this number falls considerably short of the more than 22,000 mouse protein-coding genes. Similarly, in zebrafish genetics, one-by-one gene studies using positional cloning, insertional mutagenesis, antisense morpholino oligonucleotides, targeted re-sequencing, and zinc finger and TAL endonucleases have made substantial contributions to our understanding of the biological activity of vertebrate genes, but again the number of genes studied falls well short of the more than 26,000 zebrafish protein-coding genes. Importantly, for both mice and zebrafish, none of these strategies are particularly suited to the rapid generation of knockouts in thousands of genes and the assessment of their biological activity. Here we describe an active project that aims to identify and phenotype the disruptive mutations in every zebrafish protein-coding gene, using a well-annotated zebrafish reference genome sequence, high-throughput sequencing and efficient chemical mutagenesis. So far we have identified potentially disruptive mutations in more than 38% of all known zebrafish protein-coding genes. We have developed a multi-allelic phenotyping scheme to efficiently assess the effects of each allele during embryogenesis and have analysed the phenotypic consequences of over 1,000 alleles. All mutant alleles and data are available to the community and our phenotyping scheme is adaptable to phenotypic analysis beyond embryogenesis.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsExomeFemaleGene Knockout TechniquesGenetic Complementation TestGenomeGenomicsMaleMolecular Sequence AnnotationMutagenesisMutationPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23594742
PMCPMC3743023
OpenAlexW1973938885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.