Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23594572›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2013

Targeted versus tailored multimedia patient engagement to enhance depression recognition and treatment in primary care: randomized controlled trial protocol for the AMEP2 study.

Daniel J Tancredi, Christina K Slee, Anthony Jerant, Peter Franks, Jasmine Nettiksimmons, Camille Cipri, Dustin Gottfeld, Julia Huerta, Mitchell D Feldman, Maja Jackson-Triche and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01144104 (Targeted and Tailored Messages to Enhance Depression Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01144104 nacompletednot on this map

Targeted and Tailored Messages to Enhance Depression Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2010 to 2014Enrolled925ConditionsDepressionArmsPublic Service Announcement, Interactive Multi-Media Computer Program, Sleep Hygiene Video
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Daniel J TancrediUC Davis Department of Pediatrics and Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, 2103 Stockton Blvd Suite 2224, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. djtancredi@ucdavis.edu
Christina K Slee
Anthony Jerant
Peter Franks
Jasmine Nettiksimmons
Camille Cipri
Dustin Gottfeld
Julia Huerta
Mitchell D Feldman
Maja Jackson-Triche
Steven Kelly-Reif
Andrew Hudnut
Sarah Olson
Janie Shelton
Richard L Kravitz

Funding

Targeted and Tailored Messages to Enhance Depression CareR01MH079387 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KRAVITZ, RICHARD L · 2007 to 2011
$3.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH 079387 01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression in primary care is common, yet this costly and disabling condition remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Persisting gaps in the primary care of depression are due in part to patients' reluctance to bring depressive symptoms to the attention of their primary care clinician and, when depression is diagnosed, to accept initial treatment for the condition. Both targeted and tailored communication strategies offer promise for fomenting discussion and reducing barriers to appropriate initial treatment of depression. METHODS/

designThe Activating Messages to Enhance Primary Care Practice (AMEP2) Study is a stratified randomized controlled trial comparing two computerized multimedia patient interventions -- one targeted (to patient gender and income level) and one tailored (to level of depressive symptoms, visit agenda, treatment preferences, depression causal attributions, communication self-efficacy and stigma)-- and an attention control. AMEP2 consists of two linked sub-studies, one focusing on patients with significant depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] scores ≥ 5), the other on patients with few or no depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 < 5). The first sub-study examined effectiveness of the interventions; key outcomes included delivery of components of initial depression care (antidepressant prescription or mental health referral). The second sub-study tracked potential hazards (clinical distraction and overtreatment). A telephone interview screening procedure assessed patients for eligibility and oversampled patients with significant depressive symptoms. Sampled, consenting patients used computers to answer survey questions, be randomized, and view assigned interventions just before scheduled primary care office visits. Patient surveys were also collected immediately post-visit and 12 weeks later. Physicians completed brief reporting forms after each patient's index visit. Additional data were obtained from medical record abstraction and visit audio recordings. Of 6,191 patients assessed, 867 were randomized and included in analysis, with 559 in the first sub-study and 308 in the second. DISCUSSION: Based on formative research, we developed two novel multimedia programs for encouraging patients to discuss depressive symptoms with their primary care clinicians. Our computer-based enrollment and randomization procedures ensured that randomization was fully concealed and data missingness minimized. Analyses will focus on the interventions' potential benefits among depressed persons, and the potential hazards among the non-depressed.

trial registrationClinicialTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01144104.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicPrimary Health CareAdultAntidepressive AgentsDepressionEthnicityFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultimediaOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Acceptance of Health CarePhysician-Patient RelationsProgram EvaluationAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23594572
PMCPMC3637592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.