ArticleHuman heredity2012
Population genetics of rare variants and complex diseases.
Article in Human heredity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- A heritability-optimized method for functional prioritization of rare coding variants in complex traits.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Ancestral diversity in complex disease genetics: from discovery to translation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Clinical utility of an evolving cholestasis gene panel in 10,000 children and adults.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Molecular Biomarkers in Neurological Diseases: Advances in Diagnosis and Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in variant calling: a review.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Novel mutation leading to splice donor loss in a conserved site ofJournal of medical genetics · 2024Article
- Putative protective genomic variation in the Lithuanian population.Genetics and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Targeted Sequencing Detects Variants That May Contribute to the Risk of Neuropsychiatric Disorders.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2022Article
- Translational and interdisciplinary insights into presbyacusis: A multidimensional disease.Hearing research · 2021Review
- Where Are the Disease-Associated eQTLs?Trends in genetics : TIG · 2021Review
- Population genetic variation ofJournal of genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Distinct subtypes of polycystic ovary syndrome with novel genetic associations: An unsupervised, phenotypic clustering analysis.PLoS medicine · 2020Article
- Evolutionary perspectives on polygenic selection, missing heritability, and GWAS.Human genetics · 2020Review
- The impact of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay on genetic disease, gene editing and cancer immunotherapy.Nature genetics · 2019Article
- Extensive disruption of protein interactions by genetic variants across the allele frequency spectrum in human populations.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Fine-Scale Characterization of Genomic Structural Variation in the Human Genome Reveals Adaptive and Biomedically Relevant Hotspots.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Whole-genome sequencing reveals new insights into age-related hearing loss: cumulative effects, pleiotropy and the role of selection.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Article
- Human demographic history has amplified the effects of background selection across the genome.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- RAiSD detects positive selection based on multiple signatures of a selective sweep and SNP vectors.Communications biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIdentifying drivers of complex traits from the noisy signals of genetic variation obtained from high-throughput genome sequencing technologies is a central challenge faced by human geneticists today. We hypothesize that the variants involved in complex diseases are likely to exhibit non-neutral evolutionary signatures. Uncovering the evolutionary history of all variants is therefore of intrinsic interest for complex disease research. However, doing so necessitates the simultaneous elucidation of the targets of natural selection and population-specific demographic history.
methodsHere we characterize the action of natural selection operating across complex disease categories, and use population genetic simulations to evaluate the expected patterns of genetic variation in large samples. We focus on populations that have experienced historical bottlenecks followed by explosive growth (consistent with many human populations), and describe the differences between evolutionarily deleterious mutations and those that are neutral.
resultsGenes associated with several complex disease categories exhibit stronger signatures of purifying selection than non-disease genes. In addition, loci identified through genome-wide association studies of complex traits also exhibit signatures consistent with being in regions recurrently targeted by purifying selection. Through simulations, we show that population bottlenecks and rapid growth enable deleterious rare variants to persist at low frequencies just as long as neutral variants, but low-frequency and common variants tend to be much younger than neutral variants. This has resulted in a large proportion of modern-day rare alleles that have a deleterious effect on function and that potentially contribute to disease susceptibility.
conclusionsThe key question for sequencing-based association studies of complex traits is how to distinguish between deleterious and benign genetic variation. We used population genetic simulations to uncover patterns of genetic variation that distinguish these two categories, especially derived allele age, thereby providing inroads into novel methods for characterizing rare genetic variation driving complex diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.