Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23593991›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013

The cancer therapeutic potential of Chk1 inhibitors: how mechanistic studies impact on clinical trial design.

Ruth Thompson, Alan Eastman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Phase I/II Trial of Oral SRA737 (a Chk1 Inhibitor) Given in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Patients with Advanced Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth ThompsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Alan Eastman
Dartmouth College · USUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Mechanisms of Sensitivity to Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinase InhibitorsR01CA117874 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI EASTMAN, ALAN R · 2007 to 2017
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA117874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many anticancer agents damage DNA and activate cell cycle checkpoints that permit time for the cells to repair their DNA and recover. These checkpoints have undergone intense investigation as potential therapeutic targets and Chk1 inhibitors have emerged as promising novel therapeutic agents. Chk1 was initially recognized as a regulator of the G2/M checkpoint, but has since been demonstrated to have additional roles in replication fork stability, replication origin firing and homologous recombination. Inhibition of these pathways can dramatically sensitize cells to some antimetabolites. Current clinical trials with Chk1 inhibitors are primarily focusing on their combination with gemcitabine. Here, we discuss the mechanisms of, and emerging uses for Chk1 inhibitors as single agents and in combination with antimetabolites. We also discuss the pharmacodynamic issues that need to be addressed in attaining maximum efficacy in vivo. Following administration of gemcitabine to mice and humans, tumour cells accumulate in S phase for at least 24 h before recovering. In addition, stalled replication forks evolve over time to become more Chk1 dependent. We emphasize the need to assess cell cycle perturbation and Chk1 dependence of tumours in patients administered gemcitabine. These assessments will define the optimum dose and schedule for administration of these drug combinations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell SurvivalCheckpoint Kinase 1Clinical Trials as TopicDNA DamageHumansMitosisNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesResearch DesignAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanChek1 protein, mouseProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinasescell cycle checkpointsChk1gemcitabinehomologous recombinationhydroxyureapharmacodynamics

Identifiers

PMID23593991
PMCPMC3769664
OpenAlexW1644377522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.