Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23593524›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2013

Indirect immunofluorescence assay for the simultaneous detection of antibodies against clinically important old and new world hantaviruses.

Sabine Lederer, Erik Lattwein, Merle Hanke, Karen Sonnenberg, Winfried Stoecker, Åke Lundkvist, Antti Vaheri, Olli Vapalahti, Paul K S Chan, Heinz Feldmann and 9 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02455375 (Puumala Hantavirus Infection in France), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02455375 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Puumala Hantavirus Infection in France: Evaluation of Commercial Assays for the Detection of Antibodies Against This Virus and the Use of Urine Samples for the Molecular Detection of This Infection

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier de Charleville-MézièresRan2015 to 2021Enrolled179ConditionsNephropathia Epidemica, Hemorrhagic Fever With Renal Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Seroprevalence of hantaviruses andInfection ecology & epidemiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Sabine LedererEUROIMMUN Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG, Luebeck, Germany.
Erik Lattwein
Merle Hanke
Karen Sonnenberg
Winfried Stoecker
Åke Lundkvist
Antti Vaheri
Olli Vapalahti
Paul K S Chan
Heinz Feldmann
Daryl Dick
Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit
Paula Padula
Pablo A Vial
Raluca Panculescu-Gatej
Cornelia Ceianu
Paul Heyman
Tatjana Avšič-Županc
Matthias Niedrig

Funding

Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers: Disease Modeling and TransmissionZIAAI001089 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI FELDMANN, HEINRICH · 2009 to 2025
$50.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to detect serum antibodies against clinically important Old and New World hantaviruses simultaneously, multiparametric indirect immunofluorescence assays (IFAs) based on biochip mosaics were developed. Each of the mosaic substrates consisted of cells infected with one of the virus types Hantaan (HTNV), Puumala (PUUV), Seoul (SEOV), Saaremaa (SAAV), Dobrava (DOBV), Sin Nombre (SNV) or Andes (ANDV). For assay evaluation, serum IgG and IgM antibodies were analyzed using 184 laboratory-confirmed hantavirus-positive sera collected at six diagnostic centers from patients actively or previously infected with the following hantavirus serotypes: PUUV (Finland, n=97); SEOV (China, n=5); DOBV (Romania, n=7); SNV (Canada, n=23); ANDV (Argentina and Chile, n=52). The control panel comprised 89 sera from healthy blood donors. According to the reference tests, all 184 patient samples were seropositive for hantavirus-specific IgG (n=177; 96%) and/or IgM (n=131; 72%), while all control samples were tested negative. In the multiparametric IFA applied in this study, 183 (99%) of the patient sera were IgG and 131 (71%) IgM positive (accordance with the reference tests: IgG, 96%; IgM, 93%). Overall IFA sensitivity for combined IgG and IgM analysis amounted to 100% for all serotypes, except for SNV (96%). Of the 89 control sera, 2 (2%) showed IgG reactivity against the HTNV substrate, but not against any other hantavirus. Due to the high cross-reactivity of hantaviral nucleocapsid proteins, endpoint titrations were conducted, allowing serotype determination in >90% of PUUV- and ANDV-infected patients. Thus, multiparametric IFA enables highly sensitive and specific serological diagnosis of hantavirus infections and can be used to differentiate PUUV and ANDV infection from infections with Murinae-borne hantaviruses (e.g. DOBV and SEOV).

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHantavirus InfectionsHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceOrthohantavirusAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID23593524
PMCPMC3617148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.