Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23593130›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

A real-time brain-machine interface combining motor target and trajectory intent using an optimal feedback control design.

Maryam M Shanechi, Ziv M Williams, Gregory W Wornell, Rollin C Hu, Marissa Powers, Emery N Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stochastic Optimal Control and Estimation with Multiplicative and Internal Noise.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Interfacing to the brain's motor decisions.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maryam M ShanechiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America. shanechi@cornell.edu
Ziv M Williams
Gregory W Wornell
Rollin C Hu
Marissa Powers
Emery N Brown

Funding

Dynamic Inverse Solutions for Multimodal ImagingR01EB006385 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOAS, DAVID A · 2007 to 2011
$6.7M
A Systems Neuroscience Approach for the Study of General AnesthesiaDP1OD003646 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BROWN, EMERY N · 2007 to 2011
$4.4M
Neuronal based prosthetic control of volitional movementR01HD059852 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WILLIAMS, ZIV · 2009 to 2015
$2.0M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP1-0D003646-01NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006385NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB006385NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time brain-machine interfaces (BMI) have focused on either estimating the continuous movement trajectory or target intent. However, natural movement often incorporates both. Additionally, BMIs can be modeled as a feedback control system in which the subject modulates the neural activity to move the prosthetic device towards a desired target while receiving real-time sensory feedback of the state of the movement. We develop a novel real-time BMI using an optimal feedback control design that jointly estimates the movement target and trajectory of monkeys in two stages. First, the target is decoded from neural spiking activity before movement initiation. Second, the trajectory is decoded by combining the decoded target with the peri-movement spiking activity using an optimal feedback control design. This design exploits a recursive Bayesian decoder that uses an optimal feedback control model of the sensorimotor system to take into account the intended target location and the sensory feedback in its trajectory estimation from spiking activity. The real-time BMI processes the spiking activity directly using point process modeling. We implement the BMI in experiments consisting of an instructed-delay center-out task in which monkeys are presented with a target location on the screen during a delay period and then have to move a cursor to it without touching the incorrect targets. We show that the two-stage BMI performs more accurately than either stage alone. Correct target prediction can compensate for inaccurate trajectory estimation and vice versa. The optimal feedback control design also results in trajectories that are smoother and have lower estimation error. The two-stage decoder also performs better than linear regression approaches in offline cross-validation analyses. Our results demonstrate the advantage of a BMI design that jointly estimates the target and trajectory of movement and more closely mimics the sensorimotor control system.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesAnimalsFeedbackFemaleMotor CortexObserver VariationPlacentaPregnancyRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID23593130
PMCPMC3622681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.