Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23593045›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Case management for at-risk elderly patients in the English integrated care pilots: observational study of staff and patient experience and secondary care utilisation.

Martin Roland, Richard Lewis, Adam Steventon, Gary Abel, John Adams, Martin Bardsley, Laura Brereton, Xavier Chitnis, Annalijn Conklin, Laura Staetsky and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. (Dis)Integrated Care? Lessons from East London.International journal of integrated care · 2020
    Article
  13. Emergency admission risk stratification tools in UK primary care: a cross-sectional survey of availability and use.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. What works in implementation of integrated care programs for older adults with complex needs? A realist review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Martin RolandCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
Richard Lewis
Adam Steventon
Gary Abel
John Adams
Martin Bardsley
Laura Brereton
Xavier Chitnis
Annalijn Conklin
Laura Staetsky
Sarah Tunkel
Tom Ling

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2009, the English Department of Health appointed 16 integrated care pilots which aimed to provide better integrated care. We report the quantitative results from a multi-method evaluation of six of the demonstration projects which used risk profiling tools to identify older people at risk of emergency hospital admission, combined with intensive case management for people identified as at risk. The interventions focused mainly on delivery system redesign and improved clinical information systems, two key elements of Wagner's Chronic Care Model.

methodsQuestionnaires to staff and patients. Difference-in-differences analysis of secondary care utilisation using data on 3646 patients and 17,311 matched controls, and changes in overall secondary care utilisation.

resultsMost staff thought that care for their patients had improved. More patients reported having a care plan but they found it significantly harder to see a doctor or nurse of their choice and felt less involved in decisions about their care. Case management interventions were associated with a 9% increase in emergency admissions. We found some evidence of imbalance between cases and controls which could have biased this estimate, but simulations of the possible effect of unobserved confounders showed that it was very unlikely that the sites achieved their goal of reducing emergency admissions. However, we found significant reductions of 21% and 22% in elective admissions and outpatient attendance in the six months following an intervention, and overall inpatient and outpatient costs were significantly reduced by 9% during this period. Area level analyses of whole practice populations suggested that overall outpatient attendances were significantly reduced by 5% two years after the start of the case management schemes.

conclusionCase management may result in improvements in some aspects of care and has the potential to reduce secondary care costs. However, to improve patient experience, case management approaches need to be introduced in a way which respects patients' wishes, for example the ability to see a familiar doctor or nurse.

Indexed as

case managementEnglandhospital utilizationintegrated careolder peoplepatient experiencerisk stratificationstaff experience

Identifiers

PMID23593045
PMCPMC3601529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.