ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Trading speed and accuracy by coding time: a coupled-circuit cortical model.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The NMDA receptor partial agonist d-cycloserine does not enhance motor learning.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2016Trial
- Effector-dependent stochastic reference frame transformations alter decision-making.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Bidirectional influences of information sampling and concept learning.Psychological review · 2022Article
- The unknown but knowable relationship between Presaccadic Accumulation of activity and Saccade initiation.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2021Article
- Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Attractor-like Dynamics in Belief Updating in Schizophrenia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Slot-like capacity and resource-like coding in a neural model of multiple-item working memory.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- The computations that support simple decision-making: A comparison between the diffusion and urgency-gating models.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Spike-Based Bayesian-Hebbian Learning of Temporal Sequences.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Article
- Speed-accuracy tradeoff by a control signal with balanced excitation and inhibition.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- On the neural implementation of the speed-accuracy trade-off.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2014Review
- Decoupling speed and accuracy in an urgent decision-making task reveals multiple contributions to their trade-off.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2014Review
- The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2014Review
- Neural dynamics implement a flexible decision bound with a fixed firing rate for choice: a model-based hypothesis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2014Article
- Speed accuracy trade-off under response deadlines.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our actions take place in space and time, but despite the role of time in decision theory and the growing acknowledgement that the encoding of time is crucial to behaviour, few studies have considered the interactions between neural codes for objects in space and for elapsed time during perceptual decisions. The speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) provides a window into spatiotemporal interactions. Our hypothesis is that temporal coding determines the rate at which spatial evidence is integrated, controlling the SAT by gain modulation. Here, we propose that local cortical circuits are inherently suited to the relevant spatial and temporal coding. In simulations of an interval estimation task, we use a generic local-circuit model to encode time by 'climbing' activity, seen in cortex during tasks with a timing requirement. The model is a network of simulated pyramidal cells and inhibitory interneurons, connected by conductance synapses. A simple learning rule enables the network to quickly produce new interval estimates, which show signature characteristics of estimates by experimental subjects. Analysis of network dynamics formally characterizes this generic, local-circuit timing mechanism. In simulations of a perceptual decision task, we couple two such networks. Network function is determined only by spatial selectivity and NMDA receptor conductance strength; all other parameters are identical. To trade speed and accuracy, the timing network simply learns longer or shorter intervals, driving the rate of downstream decision processing by spatially non-selective input, an established form of gain modulation. Like the timing network's interval estimates, decision times show signature characteristics of those by experimental subjects. Overall, we propose, demonstrate and analyse a generic mechanism for timing, a generic mechanism for modulation of decision processing by temporal codes, and we make predictions for experimental verification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.