Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23592053›Full record

ArticleImmunologic research2013

Superior performance of the CCP3.1 test compared to CCP2 and MCV in the rheumatoid factor-negative RA population.

Zoltán Szekanecz, Zoltán Szabó, Margit Zeher, Lilla Soós, Katalin Dankó, Ildikó Horváth, Gabriella Lakos

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunologic research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Zoltán SzekaneczDepartment of Rheumatology, Institute of Medicine, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center, Nagyerdei Str 98, Debrecen, 4032, Hungary. szekanecz.zoltan@med.unideb.hu
Zoltán Szabó
Margit Zeher
Lilla Soós
Katalin Dankó
Ildikó Horváth
Gabriella Lakos
University of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPAs) have recently been identified as sensitive and specific diagnostic and prognostic markers in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study, we wished to assess the diagnostic performance of the third-generation anti-CCP3.1 assay, but with special focus on the rheumatoid factor (RF)-negative RA population. Anti-CCP as well as anti-MCV was tested in 119 RA patients and 118 control patients using second and third-generation assays. Using these optimal cut-off levels, the diagnostic sensitivity of anti-CCP2, CCP3, and CCP3.1 was 74.8, 78.8, and 83.0%, respectively, while the specificity was 95.7, 96.6, and 98.3%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the CCP3.1 test was significantly better than that of CCP2 (p = 0.041). In addition, the CCP3.1 test performed significantly better than the MCV test as well (p = 0.0003). When the diagnostic performance of the CCP3.1, CCP2, and MCV tests was compared in the 35 RF-negative patients, the CCP3.1 test exerted significantly better performance than the MCV test (p = 0.006), and it also showed a tendency of better performance in comparison with the CCP2 test (p = 0.131). In conclusion, the CCP3.1 assay can significantly increase the sensitivity of ACPA testing in RF-negative RA, as well as in the total RA population.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesHumansPeptides, CyclicPrognosisRheumatoid FactorSensitivity and SpecificityAutoantibodiescyclic citrullinated peptidePeptides, CyclicRheumatoid Factor

Identifiers

PMID23592053
OpenAlexW2010461377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.