Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23591544›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2013

Turning oscillations into opportunities: lessons from a bacterial decision gate.

Daniel Schultz, Mingyang Lu, Trevor Stavropoulos, José Onuchic, Eshel Ben-Jacob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dynamic Modeling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The physics of bacterial decision making.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2014
    Review
  15. Noise in biology.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2014
    Review
  16. MicroRNA-based regulation of epithelial-hybrid-mesenchymal fate determination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel SchultzDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Ave, Boston MA 02215, USA.
Mingyang Lu
Trevor Stavropoulos
José Onuchic
Eshel Ben-Jacob

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sporulation vs. competence provides a prototypic example of collective cell fate determination. The decision is performed by the action of three modules: 1) A stochastic competence switch whose transition probability is regulated by population density, population stress and cell stress. 2) A sporulation timer whose clock rate is regulated by cell stress and population stress. 3) A decision gate that is coupled to the timer via a special repressilator-like loop. We show that the distinct circuit architecture of this gate leads to special dynamics and noise management characteristics: The gate opens a time-window of opportunity for competence transitions during which it generates oscillations that are turned into a chain of transition opportunities - each oscillation opens a short interval with high transition probability. The special architecture of the gate also leads to filtering of external noise and robustness against internal noise and variations in the circuit parameters.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaCell ProliferationModels, BiologicalBiological ClocksCell SurvivalComputer Simulation

Identifiers

PMID23591544
PMCPMC3627974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.