Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23591504›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2013

Large-scale unassisted smoking cessation over 50 years: lessons from history for endgame planning in tobacco control.

Simon Chapman, Melanie A Wakefield

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Living under a cloud: Electronic cigarettes and the dental patient.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quit Methods Used by American Smokers, 2013-2014.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A Risk-Continuum Categorization of Product Use Among US Youth Tobacco Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Harm reduction at the crossroads: the case of e-cigarettes.American journal of preventive medicine · 2014
    Article
  13. CDC Grand Rounds: global tobacco control.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon ChapmanSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. simon.chapman@sydney.edu.au
Melanie A Wakefield

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 50 years since the twentieth century's smoking epidemic began to decline from the beginning of the 1960s, hundreds of millions of smokers around the world have stopped smoking permanently. Overwhelmingly, most stopped without any formal assistance in the form of medication or professional assistance, including many millions of former heavy smokers. Nascent discussion about national and global tobacco endgame scenarios is dominated by an assumption that transitioning from cigarettes to alternative forms of potent, consumer-acceptable forms of nicotine will be essential to the success of endgames. This appears to uncritically assume (1) the hardening hypothesis: that as smoking prevalence moves toward and below 10%, the remaining smokers will be mostly deeply addicted, and will be largely unable to stop smoking unless they are able to move to other forms of 'clean' nicotine addiction such as e-cigarettes and more potent forms of nicotine replacement; and (2) an overly medicalised view of smoking cessation that sees unassisted cessation as both inefficient and inhumane. In this paper, we question these assumptions. We also note that some vanguard nations which continue to experience declining smoking prevalence have long banned smokeless tobacco and non-therapeutic forms of nicotine delivery. We argue that there are potentially risky consequences of unravelling such bans when history suggests that large-scale cessation is demonstrably possible.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionTobacco Use Cessation Devices

Identifiers

PMID23591504
PMCPMC3632984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.