Questions for a tobacco-free future.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Identifying how tobacco industry-targeted communities perceive California's tobacco endgame initiative.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2025
   Article
2. Support for tobacco endgame approaches: Results from a web-based survey of stakeholders from 28 African countries.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025
   Article
3. The tobacco endgame: a qualitative review and synthesis.Tobacco control · 2016
   Review
4. The tobacco endgame: is it possible?PLoS medicine · 2015
   Article
5. Smokers' support for tobacco endgame measures in Canada: findings from the 2016 International Tobacco Control Smoking and Vaping Survey.CMAJ open
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as