Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23591483›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2013

Evaluation of protective effect of multiantigenic DNA vaccine encoding MIC3 and ROP18 antigen segments of Toxoplasma gondii in mice.

Daofeng Qu, Jianzhong Han, Aifang Du

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review on efficiency of microneme proteins to induce protective immunity against Toxoplasma gondii.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. HarnessingAnnals of medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. MIC13 ofJournal of parasitology research · 2025
    Article
  4. Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2025
    Article
  5. CD4Vaccines · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Rhoptry antigens asClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2019
    Review
  9. Recent progress in microneme-based vaccines development againstClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daofeng QuFood Safety Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310035, People's Republic of China. daofeng@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn
Jianzhong Han
Aifang Du
Zhejiang Gongshang University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high incidence and severe damage caused by Toxoplasma gondii infection clearly indicates the need for the development of a vaccine. In this study, we evaluated the immune responses and protection against toxoplasmosis by immunizing ICR mice with a multiantigenic DNA vaccine. To develop the multiantigenic vaccine, two T. gondii antigens, MIC3 and ROP18, selected on the basis of previous studies were chosen. ICR mice were immunized subcutaneously with PBS, empty pcDNA3.1 vector, pMIC3, pROP18, and pROP18-MIC3, respectively. The results of lymphocyte proliferation assay, cytokine, and antibody determinations showed that mice immunized with pROP18-MIC3 elicited stronger humoral and Th1-type cellular immune responses than those immunized with single-gene plasmids, empty plasmid, or phosphate-buffered saline. After a lethal challenge with the highly virulent T. gondii RH strain, a prolonged survival time in pROP18-MIC3-immunized mice was observed in comparison to control groups. Our study indicates that the introduction of multiantigenic DNA vaccine is more powerful and efficient than single-gene vaccine, and deserves further evaluation and development.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanCell ProliferationCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleInjections, SubcutaneousLymphocytesMiceMice, Inbred ICRProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtozoan ProteinsProtozoan VaccinesSurvival AnalysisToxoplasmaAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanCytokinesMIC3 protein, Toxoplasma gondiiProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtozoan ProteinsProtozoan VaccinesROP18 protein, Toxoplasma gondiiVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID23591483
OpenAlexW2164269222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.