Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23591479›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2013

Comb-push ultrasound shear elastography (CUSE) with various ultrasound push beams.

Pengfei Song, Matthew W Urban, Armando Manduca, Heng Zhao, James F Greenleaf, Shigao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fast Local Phase Velocity-Based Imaging: Shear Wave Particle Velocity and Displacement Motion Study.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020
    Article
  18. Evaluation of Reconstruction Parameters for 2-D Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pengfei SongDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester,MN 55905 USA. song.pengfei@mayo.edu
Matthew W Urban
Armando Manduca
Heng Zhao
James F Greenleaf
Shigao Chen

Funding

Multidimensional Heart Imaging With UltrasoundR01EB002167 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GREENLEAF, JAMES FOWLER, PISLARU, CRISTINA · 2003 to 2014
$6.1M
Virtual Biopsy with Ultrasound for Liver Fibrosis StagingR01DK082408 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CHEN, SHIGAO · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB002167NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002167NIDDK NIH HHS DK082408NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK082408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comb-push ultrasound shear elastography (CUSE) has recently been shown to be a fast and accurate 2-D elasticity imaging technique that can provide a full field-of-view (FOV) shear wave speed map with only one rapid data acquisition. The initial version of CUSE was termed U-CUSE because unfocused ultrasound push beams were used. In this paper, we present two new versions of CUSE-focused CUSE (F-CUSE) and marching CUSE (M-CUSE), which use focused ultrasound push beams to improve acoustic radiation force penetration and produce stronger shear waves in deep tissues (e.g., kidney and liver). F-CUSE divides transducer elements into several subgroups which transmit multiple focused ultrasound beams simultaneously. M-CUSE uses more elements for each focused push beam and laterally marches the push beams. Both F-CUSE and M-CUSE can generate comb-shaped shear wave fields that have shear wave motion at each imaging pixel location so that a full FOV 2-D shear wave speed map can be reconstructed with only one data acquisition. Homogeneous phantom experiments showed that U-CUSE, F-CUSE, and M-CUSE can all produce smooth shear wave speed maps with accurate shear wave speed estimates. An inclusion phantom experiment showed that all CUSE methods could provide good contrast between the inclusion and background with sharp boundaries while F-CUSE and M-CUSE require shorter push durations to achieve shear wave speed maps with comparable SNR to U-CUSE. A more challenging inclusion phantom experiment with a very stiff and deep inclusion shows that better shear wave penetration could be gained by using F-CUSE and M-CUSE. Finally, a shallow inclusion experiment showed that good preservations of inclusion shapes could be achieved by both U-CUSE and F-CUSE in the near field. Safety measurements showed that all safety parameters are below FDA regulatory limits for all CUSE methods. These promising results suggest that, using various push beams, CUSE is capable of reconstructing a 2-D full FOV shear elasticity map using only one push-detection data acquisition in a wide range of depths for soft tissue elasticity imaging.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, BiologicalPhantoms, ImagingSignal-To-Noise RatioUltrasonography, Mammary

Identifiers

PMID23591479
PMCPMC3760382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.