Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23589890›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Physical and genetic-interaction density reveals functional organization and informs significance cutoffs in genome-wide screens.

John C Dittmar, Steven Pierce, Rodney Rothstein, Robert J D Reid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Synthetic physical interactions map kinetochore regulators and regions sensitive to constitutive Cdc14 localization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John C DittmarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Steven Pierce
Rodney Rothstein
Robert J D Reid

Funding

Mechanism of spontaneous and DSB-induced repairR37GM050237 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROTHSTEIN, RODNEY J. · 2005 to 2014
$6.0M
MECHANISM OF SPONTANEOUS AND DSB-INDUCED REPAIRR01GM050237 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ROTHSTEIN, RODNEY J. · 1993 to 2016
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM050237NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050237NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM050237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide experiments often measure quantitative differences between treated and untreated cells to identify affected strains. For these studies, statistical models are typically used to determine significance cutoffs. We developed a method termed "CLIK" (Cutoff Linked to Interaction Knowledge) that overlays biological knowledge from the interactome on screen results to derive a cutoff. The method takes advantage of the fact that groups of functionally related interacting genes often respond similarly to experimental conditions and, thus, cluster in a ranked list of screen results. We applied CLIK analysis to five screens of the yeast gene disruption library and found that it defined a significance cutoff that differed from traditional statistics. Importantly, verification experiments revealed that the CLIK cutoff correlated with the position in the rank order where the rate of true positives drops off significantly. In addition, the gene sets defined by CLIK analysis often provide further biological perspectives. For example, applying CLIK analysis retrospectively to a screen for cisplatin sensitivity allowed us to identify the importance of the Hrq1 helicase in DNA crosslink repair. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of CLIK to determine optimal treatment conditions by analyzing genome-wide screens at multiple rapamycin concentrations. We show that CLIK is an extremely useful tool for evaluating screen quality, determining screen cutoffs, and comparing results between screens. Furthermore, because CLIK uses previously annotated interaction data to determine biologically informed cutoffs, it provides additional insights into screen results, which supplement traditional statistical approaches.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalCisplatinGenome, FungalHumansMutationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSignal TransductionSirolimusCisplatinSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID23589890
PMCPMC3645594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.