Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23589680›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2013

Potential role of tedizolid phosphate in the treatment of acute bacterial skin infections.

Olatz Urbina, Olivia Ferrández, Mercè Espona, Esther Salas, Irene Ferrández, Santiago Grau

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Importance and Reality of TDM for Antibiotics Not Covered by Insurance in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. New antibiotics for bad bugs: where are we?Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olatz UrbinaServices of Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital Universitari del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Olivia Ferrández
Mercè Espona
Esther Salas
Irene Ferrández
Santiago Grau
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tedizolid phosphate (TR-701), a prodrug of tedizolid (TR-700), is a next-generation oxazolidinone that has shown favorable results in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections in its first Phase III clinical trial. Tedizolid has high bioavailability, penetration, and tissue distribution when administered orally or intravenously. The activity of tedizolid was greater than linezolid against strains of Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp. in vitro studies, including strains resistant to linezolid and those not susceptible to vancomycin or daptomycin. Its pharmacokinetic characteristics allow for a once-daily administration that leads to a more predictable efficacy and safety profile than those of linezolid. No hematological adverse effects have been reported associated with tedizolid when used at the therapeutic dose of 200 mg in Phase I, II, or III clinical trials of up to 3 weeks of tedizolid administration. Given that the clinical and microbiological efficacy are similar for the 200, 300, and 400 mg doses, the lowest effective dose of 200 mg once daily for 6 days was selected for Phase III studies in acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections, providing a safe dosing regimen with low potential for development of myelosuppression. Unlike linezolid, tedizolid does not inhibit monoamine oxidase in vivo, therefore interactions with adrenergic, dopaminergic, and serotonergic drugs are not to be expected. In conclusion, tedizolid is a novel antibiotic with potent activity against Gram-positive microorganisms responsible for skin and soft tissue infections, including strains resistant to vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin, thus answers a growing therapeutic need.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological AvailabilityDrug Resistance, BacterialGram-Positive BacteriaHumansOrganophosphatesOxazolesSkin Diseases, BacterialSoft Tissue InfectionsTissue DistributionAnti-Bacterial AgentsOrganophosphatesOxazolestedizolid phosphatelinezolid resistanceoxazolidinoneskin and soft tissue infectionstedizolidTR-700TR-701 FA

Identifiers

PMID23589680
PMCPMC3622392
OpenAlexW2055611303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.