ReviewJournal of digital imaging2013
Quantitative imaging biomarker ontology (QIBO) for knowledge representation of biomedical imaging biomarkers.
Review in Journal of digital imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Essentials of Statistical Methods for Assessing Reliability and Agreement in Quantitative Imaging.Academic radiology · 2018Review
- Developing the Quantitative Histopathology Image Ontology (QHIO): A case study using the hot spot detection problem.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Neuroimaging Feature Terminology: A Controlled Terminology for the Annotation of Brain Imaging Features.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2017Article
- Semantic representation of reported measurements in radiology.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Article
- Terminology development towards harmonizing multiple clinical neuroimaging research repositories.Data integration in the life sciences : ... International Workshop, DILS ... : proceedings. DILS (Conference) · 2015Article
- Biomedical imaging ontologies: A survey and proposal for future work.Journal of pathology informatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedOuellette, M [removed]; Danagoulian, J [removed]; Wernsing, G [removed]
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A widening array of novel imaging biomarkers is being developed using ever more powerful clinical and preclinical imaging modalities. These biomarkers have demonstrated effectiveness in quantifying biological processes as they occur in vivo and in the early prediction of therapeutic outcomes. However, quantitative imaging biomarker data and knowledge are not standardized, representing a critical barrier to accumulating medical knowledge based on quantitative imaging data. We use an ontology to represent, integrate, and harmonize heterogeneous knowledge across the domain of imaging biomarkers. This advances the goal of developing applications to (1) improve precision and recall of storage and retrieval of quantitative imaging-related data using standardized terminology; (2) streamline the discovery and development of novel imaging biomarkers by normalizing knowledge across heterogeneous resources; (3) effectively annotate imaging experiments thus aiding comprehension, re-use, and reproducibility; and (4) provide validation frameworks through rigorous specification as a basis for testable hypotheses and compliance tests. We have developed the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Ontology (QIBO), which currently consists of 488 terms spanning the following upper classes: experimental subject, biological intervention, imaging agent, imaging instrument, image post-processing algorithm, biological target, indicated biology, and biomarker application. We have demonstrated that QIBO can be used to annotate imaging experiments with standardized terms in the ontology and to generate hypotheses for novel imaging biomarker-disease associations. Our results established the utility of QIBO in enabling integrated analysis of quantitative imaging data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.