ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2013
Reducing central line infections in pediatric and neonatal patients.
Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduction of unnecessary antibiotic days in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022Article
- Surveillance of bloodstream infections in pediatric cancer centers - what have we learned and how do we move on?GMS hygiene and infection control · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The stakes for the prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) have increased dramatically over the past decade. Over the past 10 years, the rate of CLABSI in the pediatric population has dropped markedly due to the significant investment in this initiative. Although there has been a substantial increase in studies on CLABSIs, difficulties in studying CLABSIs have limited the quality of the evidence produced. These difficulties include challenges in the sample size required to complete trials, pressure from external regulatory forces to reduce CLABSI rates, and challenges in defining CLABSIs. The definition of CLABSI is continuously being updated to improve the misclassification bias inherent in defining CLABSI. This is especially relevant given the stress placed on decreasing health-care-associated infections and the negative consequences associated if unsuccessful. In order to prevent CLABSIs, pediatric and neonatal intensive care units have formed bundles of basic evidenced-based strategies leading to effective reduction of CLABSIs. These basic bundles have been modified for spread to other nonintensive care areas, also yielding great results. However, additional therapies above the basic bundle have yielded mixed results, and more research is needed to understand the cost effectiveness of these therapies in the setting of decreasing CLABSI rates. As a goal, a "getting to zero" CLABSI rate should be set, but it may not be possible without significant resource allocation.
Identifiers
23588892What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.