Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23588564›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Potentially inappropriate medication use among patients with Alzheimer disease in the REAL.FR cohort: be aware of atropinic and benzodiazepine drugs!

François Montastruc, Virginie Gardette, Christelle Cantet, Antoine Piau, Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre, Bruno Vellas, Jean-Louis Montastruc, Sandrine Andrieu, REAL.FR Group

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Use of Benzodiazepines in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Literature.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

François MontastrucLaboratoire de Pharmacologie Médicale et Clinique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Toulouse, 37 allées Jules-Guesde, 31000 Toulouse, France.
Virginie Gardette
Christelle Cantet
Antoine Piau
Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre
Bruno Vellas
Jean-Louis Montastruc
Sandrine Andrieu
REAL.FR Group
Inserm · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFew studies have investigated potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of PIM in community-dwelling patients diagnosed with mild-to-moderate AD and identify the clinical factors associated with PIM prescriptions.

methodsREAL.FR is a 4-year, prospective, multicenter French cohort of AD patients recruited in centers of expertise. We analyzed patient baseline data at entry into the study. PIMs were assessed using the Laroche list. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess factors associated with PIMs.

resultsA total of 684 AD patients were enrolled in the study [mean age 77.9 ± 6.8 years, 486 (71.0 %) females]. According to the Laroche list, 46.8 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 43.0-50.5 %] of the patients had at least one PIM. "Cerebral vasodilators" were the most widely used class of PIM, accounting for 24.0 % (95 % CI 20.9-27.3 %) of all prescriptions, followed by atropinic drugs (17.0 %, 95 % CI 14.1-19.8 %) and long half-life benzodiazepines (8.5 %, 95 % CI 6.4-10.6 %). Atropinic drugs were associated with cholinesterase inhibitors in 16 % of patients. In the multivariate analysis, only two factors, namely, female gender [odds ratio (OR) 1.5, 95 % CI 1.1-2.2] and polypharmacy (≥5 drugs; OR 3.6, 95 % CI 2.6-4.5) were associated with prescriptions for PIMs.

conclusionsThese results reveal that approximately one out of two community-dwelling patients with mild-to-moderate AD treated by AD specialists use PIMs. They also indicate that the characteristics of the disease and the pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic profile of the drugs prescribed are not sufficiently taken into account by physicians when prescribing for AD patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAtropine DerivativesBenzodiazepinesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingLogistic ModelsMalePolypharmacyPrevalenceProspective StudiesAtropine DerivativesBenzodiazepines

Identifiers

PMID23588564
OpenAlexW2066578763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.