Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23587939›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in plant biology2013

In vivo biochemistry: applications for small molecule biosensors in plant biology.

Alexander M Jones, Guido Grossmann, Jonas Åh Danielson, Davide Sosso, Li-Qing Chen, Cheng-Hsun Ho, Wolf B Frommer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in plant biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Fluorescent Labeling and Confocal Microcopy of Plastids and Stromules.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  8. A Retro-Perspective on Auxin Transport.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  9. Enhancement of Probe Density in DNA Sensing by Tuning the Exponential Growth Regime of Polyelectrolyte Multilayers.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. "Second-generation" fluorogenic RNA-based sensors.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2019
    Review
  13. Sugar Partitioning betweenPlant physiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. PScientific reports · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander M JonesCarnegie Institution for Science, Department of Plant Biology, 260 Panama St., Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Guido Grossmann
Jonas Åh Danielson
Davide Sosso
Li-Qing Chen
Cheng-Hsun Ho
Wolf B Frommer
Carnegie Institution for Science · USDepartment of Plant Biology · US

Funding

Sugar signaling networks detected by high content fluxomicxR01DK079109 · NIDDK · CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. · PI FROMMER, WOLF B · 2007 to 2010
$2.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revolutionary new technologies, namely in the areas of DNA sequencing and molecular imaging, continue to impact new discoveries in plant science and beyond. For decades we have been able to determine properties of enzymes, receptors and transporters in vitro or in heterologous systems, and more recently been able to analyze their regulation at the transcriptional level, to use GFP reporters for obtaining insights into cellular and subcellular localization, and tp measure ion and metabolite levels with unprecedented precision using mass spectrometry. However, we lack key information on the location and dynamics of the substrates of enzymes, receptors and transporters, and on the regulation of these proteins in their cellular environment. Such information can now be obtained by transitioning from in vitro to in vivo biochemistry using biosensors. Genetically encoded fluorescent protein-based sensors for ion and metabolite dynamics provide highly resolved spatial and temporal information, and are complemented by sensors for pH, redox, voltage, and tension. They serve as powerful tools for identifying missing processes (e.g., glucose transport across ER membranes), components (e.g., SWEET sugar transporters for cellular sugar efflux), and signaling networks (e.g., from systematic screening of mutants that affect sugar transport or cytosolic and vacuolar pH). Combined with the knowledge of properties of enzymes and transporters and their interactions with the regulatory machinery, biosensors promise to be key diagnostic tools for systems and synthetic biology.

Indexed as

Plant Physiological PhenomenaBiochemistryBiological TransportBiosensing TechniquesCarrier ProteinsEnzymesFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferGlucoseGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMolecular ImagingSignal TransductionSynthetic BiologyCarrier ProteinsEnzymesGlucoseGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23587939
PMCPMC3679211
OpenAlexW2037088412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.