SynthesisGlobalization and health2013
'BRICS without straw'? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies' influence in global health.
Synthesis in Globalization and health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Defining global health: findings from a systematic review and thematic analysis of the literature.BMJ global health · 2021Pooled it
- Participation pathways in global vaccine partnerships and their implications for immunization systems: a comparative analysis of China and India in Gavi.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Health expenditure, governance and SDG3 nexus: a longitudinal analysis in BRICS economies.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- States, global power and access to medicines: a comparative case study of China, India and the United States, 2000-2019.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- Epidemiological trends and age-period-cohort effects on subarachnoid hemorrhage burden across the BRICS-plus from 1992 to 2021.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The priority areas and possible pathways for health cooperation in BRICS countries.Global health research and policy · 2023Review
- How is aid used to exert power? Gender equality promotion and migration control in Senegal.Journal of international development · 2022Article
- Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- Trends in Hospital Admission Rates and Associated Direct Healthcare Costs in Brazil: A Nationwide Retrospective Study between 2000 and 2015.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2020Article
- Policy processesPolicy sciences · 2020Article
- Evaluation of a consulting training course for international development assistance for health.BMC medical education · 2018Article
- South-south collaboration on HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment research: when birds of a feather rarely flock together.Globalization and health · 2018Article
- Understanding how domestic health policy is integrated into foreign policy in South Africa: a case for accelerating access to antiretroviral medicines.Global health action · 2017Article
- Readability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Phase II-IV Clinical Trials in China.PloS one · 2016Article
- A comparative study of patients' attitudes toward clinical research in the United States and urban and rural China.Clinical and translational science · 2015Article
- Alcohol, binge drinking and associated mental health problems in young urban Chileans.PloS one · 2015Article
- Essential drugs production in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS): opportunities and challenges.International journal of health policy and management · 2014Review
- On the margins of aid orthodoxy: the Brazil-Mozambique collaboration to produce essential medicines in Africa.Globalization and health · 2014Article
- Sleep complaints in the Brazilian population: Impact of socioeconomic factors.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2014Article
- Socioeconomic inequalities and mortality trends in BRICS, 1990-2010.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince 2010, five newly emerging economies collectively known as 'BRICS' (Brazil, India, Russia, China and South Africa) have caught the imagination, and scholarly attention, of political scientists, economists and development specialists. The prospect of a unified geopolitical bloc, consciously seeking to re-frame international (and global) health development with a new set of ideas and values, has also, if belatedly, begun to attract the attention of the global health community. But what influence, if any, do the BRICS wield in global health, and, if they do wield influence, how has that influence been conceptualized and recorded in the literature?
methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review in (March-December 2012) of documents retrieved from the databases EMBASE, PubMed/Medline, Global Health, and Google Scholar, and the websites of relevant international organisations, research institutions and philanthropic organisations. The results were synthesised using a framework of influence developed for the review from the political science literature.
resultsOur initial search of databases and websites yielded 887 documents. Exclusion criteria narrowed the number of documents to 71 journal articles and 23 reports. Two researchers using an agreed set of inclusion criteria independently screened the 94 documents, leaving just 7 documents. We found just one document that provided sustained analysis of the BRICS' collective influence; the overwhelming tendency was to describe individual BRICS countries influence. Although influence was predominantly framed by BRICS countries' material capability, there were examples of institutional and ideational influence - particularly from Brazil. Individual BRICS countries were primarily 'opportunity seekers' and region mobilisers but with potential to become 'issue leaders' and region organisers.
conclusionThough small in number, the written output on BRICS influence in global health has increased significantly since a similar review conducted in 2010 found just one study. Whilst it may still be 'early days' for newly-emerging economies influence in global health to have matured, we argue that there is scope to further develop the concept of influence in global health, but also to better understand the ontology of groups of countries such as BRICS. The BRICS have made a number of important commitments towards reforming global health, but if they are to be more than a memorable acronym they need to start putting those collective commitments into action. Keywords BRICS, global health, influence, newly emerging economies, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.