ArticleBMC systems biology2013
Optimization of personalized therapies for anticancer treatment.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Potential of Chemically Matched Fragments as Internal Standards for Quantitative SERS with Panobinostat.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Selection of the optimal personalized treatment from multiple treatments with right-censored multivariate outcome measures.Journal of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Personalized treatment selection using observational data.Journal of applied statistics · 2023Article
- Optimal Personalized Treatment Selection with Multivariate Outcome Measures in a Multiple Treatment Case.Communications in statistics: Simulation and computation · 2023Article
- Quantiles based personalized treatment selection for multivariate outcomes and multiple treatments.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Multi-Response Based Personalized Treatment Selection with Data from Crossover Designs for Multiple Treatments.Communications in statistics: Simulation and computation · 2022Article
- Personalized treatment selection using data from crossover designs with carry-over effects.Statistics in medicine · 2019Article
- Mechanochemical Disruption Suppresses Metastatic Phenotype and Pushes Prostate Cancer Cells toward Apoptosis.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2019Article
- Bioactivities of ethanol extract from the Antarctic freshwater microalga,International journal of medical sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs today, there are hundreds of targeted therapies for the treatment of cancer, many of which have companion biomarkers that are in use to inform treatment decisions. If we would consider this whole arsenal of targeted therapies as a treatment option for every patient, very soon we will reach a scenario where each patient is positive for several markers suggesting their treatment with several targeted therapies. Given the documented side effects of anticancer drugs, it is clear that such a strategy is unfeasible.
resultsHere, we propose a strategy that optimizes the design of combinatorial therapies to achieve the best response rates with the minimal toxicity. In this methodology markers are assigned to drugs such that we achieve a high overall response rate while using personalized combinations of minimal size. We tested this methodology in an in silico cancer patient cohort, constructed from in vitro data for 714 cell lines and 138 drugs reported by the Sanger Institute. Our analysis indicates that, even in the context of personalized medicine, combinations of three or more drugs are required to achieve high response rates. Furthermore, patient-to-patient variations in pharmacokinetics have a significant impact in the overall response rate. A 10 fold increase in the pharmacokinetics variations resulted in a significant drop the overall response rate.
conclusionsThe design of optimal combinatorial therapy for anticancer treatment requires a transition from the one-drug/one-biomarker approach to global strategies that simultaneously assign makers to a catalog of drugs. The methodology reported here provides a framework to achieve this transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.