Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23587261›Full record

ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2013

Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis.

Gabriele Simonini, Andrea Taddio, Marco Cattalini, Roberto Caputo, Cinzia de Libero, Fulvio Parentin, Ilaria Pagnini, Loredana Lepore, Rolando Cimaz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Uveitis in Children and Adolescents.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriele SimoniniDepartment of Paediatrics, Rheumatology Unit, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, Firenze 24 50139, Italy.
Andrea TaddioInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - Trieste, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Marco CattaliniPediatric Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Roberto CaputoDepartment of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology Unit, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy.
Cinzia de LiberoOphthalmology Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - Trieste, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Fulvio ParentinOphthalmology Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - Trieste, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Ilaria PagniniDepartment of Paediatrics, Rheumatology Unit, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, Firenze 24 50139, Italy.
Loredana LeporeInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - Trieste, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Rolando CimazDepartment of Paediatrics, Rheumatology Unit, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, Firenze 24 50139, Italy.
University of Florence · ITUniversity of Trieste · ITUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonetheless biologic modifier therapies are available treatment strategies for sight-threatening uveitis in children, the lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled studies limits our understanding of timing of therapy when to commence therapy, which agent to choose and how long to continue treatment, and, in case of failure, if switching to another anti-TNF-α strategy might be eventually an option. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα therapy versus Adalimumab used after the failure of a previous anti-TNFα (Infliximab) in an open-label, comparative, multi-center, cohort study of childhood chronic uveitis.

methods26 patients (14 F, 12 M; median age: 8.6 years) with refractory, non-infectious active uveitis were enrolled. Due to the refractory course of uveitis to previous DMARD treatment, Group 1 received Adalimumab (24 mg/sq mt, every 2 weeks), as first anti-TNFα choice; Group 2 received Adalimumab, as second anti-TNFα drug, due to the loss of efficacy of Infliximab, administered after a period of at least 1 year. Both groups received Adalimumab for at least 1 year of treatment. Primary outcome was, once remission was achieved, the time to a first relapse.

results14 children (10 with JIA, 3 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with Behçet's disease) were recruited in Group 1; 12 children (7 with JIA, 3 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with early-onset sarcoidosis, 1 with Behçet's disease) in Group 2. Group 2 showed a lower probability to steroid discontinuation during the first 12 months of treatment (Mantel-Cox χ(2)4.12, p<0.04). In long-term follow-up, Group 1 had higher probability of uveitis remission during the time of treatment on Adalimumab (median ±SE: 18 ±1.1 vs 4 ±0.6 months, CI 95%: 15.6-27.5 vs 2.7-5.2, Mantel-Cox χ(2)10.12, p<0.002).

conclusionsEven if limited to a relatively small group, our study suggests a better efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα treatment in childhood chronic uveitis.

Indexed as

AdalimumabChildrenChronic uveitisInfliximab

Identifiers

PMID23587261
PMCPMC3637103
OpenAlexW2160986349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.