Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23587118›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2012

SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler.

Ruibang Luo, Binghang Liu, Yinlong Xie, Zhenyu Li, Weihua Huang, Jianying Yuan, Guangzhu He, Yanxiang Chen, Qi Pan, Yunjie Liu and 20 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2,802 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,802citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,802 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Global spread of carbapenem-resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Natural Selection Drives Codon Usage Bias in the Mitochondrial Genome ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic Characterization and Taxonomic Classification ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2,742 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Ruibang LuoBGI HK Research Institute, 16 Dai Fu Street, Tai Po Industrial Estate, Hong Kong. twlam@cs.hku.hk.
Binghang Liu
Yinlong Xie
Zhenyu Li
Weihua Huang
Jianying Yuan
Guangzhu He
Yanxiang Chen
Qi Pan
Yunjie Liu
Jingbo Tang
Gengxiong Wu
Hao Zhang
Yujian Shi
Yong Liu
Chang Yu
Bo Wang
Yao Lu
Changlei Han
David W Cheung
Siu-Ming Yiu
Shaoliang Peng
Zhu Xiaoqian
Guangming Liu
Xiangke Liao
Yingrui Li
Huanming Yang
Jian Wang
Tak-Wah Lam
Jun Wang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a rapidly increasing amount of de novo genome assembly using next-generation sequencing (NGS) short reads; however, several big challenges remain to be overcome in order for this to be efficient and accurate. SOAPdenovo has been successfully applied to assemble many published genomes, but it still needs improvement in continuity, accuracy and coverage, especially in repeat regions.

findingsTo overcome these challenges, we have developed its successor, SOAPdenovo2, which has the advantage of a new algorithm design that reduces memory consumption in graph construction, resolves more repeat regions in contig assembly, increases coverage and length in scaffold construction, improves gap closing, and optimizes for large genome.

conclusionsBenchmark using the Assemblathon1 and GAGE datasets showed that SOAPdenovo2 greatly surpasses its predecessor SOAPdenovo and is competitive to other assemblers on both assembly length and accuracy. We also provide an updated assembly version of the 2008 Asian (YH) genome using SOAPdenovo2. Here, the contig and scaffold N50 of the YH genome were ~20.9 kbp and ~22 Mbp, respectively, which is 3-fold and 50-fold longer than the first published version. The genome coverage increased from 81.16% to 93.91%, and memory consumption was ~2/3 lower during the point of largest memory consumption.

Identifiers

PMID23587118
PMCPMC3626529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.