Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23587026›Full record

ReviewBMC ecology2013

A decadal view of biodiversity informatics: challenges and priorities.

Alex Hardisty, Dave Roberts, Biodiversity Informatics Community, Wouter Addink, Bart Aelterman, Donat Agosti, Linda Amaral-Zettler, Arturo H Ariño, Christos Arvanitidis, Thierry Backeljau and 71 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC ecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

81 authors.

Alex HardistySchool of Computer Science and Informatics, Cardiff University, Queens Buildings, 5 The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK. hardistyar@cardiff.ac.uk
Dave Roberts
Biodiversity Informatics Community
Wouter Addink
Bart Aelterman
Donat Agosti
Linda Amaral-Zettler
Arturo H Ariño
Christos Arvanitidis
Thierry Backeljau
Nicolas Bailly
Lee Belbin
Walter Berendsohn
Nic Bertrand
Neil Caithness
David Campbell
Guy Cochrane
Noël Conruyt
Alastair Culham
Christian Damgaard
Neil Davies
Bruno Fady
Sarah Faulwetter
Alan Feest
Dawn Field
Eric Garnier
Guntram Geser
Jack Gilbert
Grosche
David Grosser
Alex Hardisty
Bénédicte Herbinet
Donald Hobern
Andrew Jones
Yde de Jong
David King
Sandra Knapp
Hanna Koivula
Wouter Los
Chris Meyer
Robert A Morris
Norman Morrison
David Morse
Matthias Obst
Evagelos Pafilis
Larry M Page
Roderic Page
Thomas Pape
Cynthia Parr
Alan Paton
David Patterson
Elisabeth Paymal
Lyubomir Penev
Marc Pollet
Richard Pyle
Eckhard von Raab-Straube
Vincent Robert
Dave Roberts
Tim Robertson
Olivier Rovellotti
Hannu Saarenmaa
Peter Schalk
Joop Schaminee
Paul Schofield
Andy Sier
Soraya Sierra
Vince Smith
Edwin van Spronsen
Simon Thornton-Wood
Peter van Tienderen
Jan van Tol
Éamonn Ó Tuama
Peter Uetz
Lea Vaas
Régine Vignes Lebbe
Todd Vision
Duong Vu
Aaike De Wever
Richard White
Kathy Willis
Fiona Young

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity informatics plays a central enabling role in the research community's efforts to address scientific conservation and sustainability issues. Great strides have been made in the past decade establishing a framework for sharing data, where taxonomy and systematics has been perceived as the most prominent discipline involved. To some extent this is inevitable, given the use of species names as the pivot around which information is organised. To address the urgent questions around conservation, land-use, environmental change, sustainability, food security and ecosystem services that are facing Governments worldwide, we need to understand how the ecosystem works. So, we need a systems approach to understanding biodiversity that moves significantly beyond taxonomy and species observations. Such an approach needs to look at the whole system to address species interactions, both with their environment and with other species.It is clear that some barriers to progress are sociological, basically persuading people to use the technological solutions that are already available. This is best addressed by developing more effective systems that deliver immediate benefit to the user, hiding the majority of the technology behind simple user interfaces. An infrastructure should be a space in which activities take place and, as such, should be effectively invisible.This community consultation paper positions the role of biodiversity informatics, for the next decade, presenting the actions needed to link the various biodiversity infrastructures invisibly and to facilitate understanding that can support both business and policy-makers. The community considers the goal in biodiversity informatics to be full integration of the biodiversity research community, including citizens' science, through a commonly-shared, sustainable e-infrastructure across all sub-disciplines that reliably serves science and society alike.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsComputational BiologyEcosystemHumansInformation Dissemination

Identifiers

PMID23587026
PMCPMC3843378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.