Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23586054›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2013

Translational biomedical informatics in the cloud: present and future.

Jiajia Chen, Fuliang Qian, Wenying Yan, Bairong Shen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Preference of cancer patients and family members regarding delivery of bad news and differences in clinical practice among medical staff.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Blood-borne biomarkers and bioindicators for linking exposure to health effects in environmental health science.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiajia ChenCenter for Systems Biology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Fuliang Qian
Wenying Yan
Bairong Shen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next generation sequencing and other high-throughput experimental techniques of recent decades have driven the exponential growth in publicly available molecular and clinical data. This information explosion has prepared the ground for the development of translational bioinformatics. The scale and dimensionality of data, however, pose obvious challenges in data mining, storage, and integration. In this paper we demonstrated the utility and promise of cloud computing for tackling the big data problems. We also outline our vision that cloud computing could be an enabling tool to facilitate translational bioinformatics research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchInformation Storage and RetrievalSoftwareAnimalsComputational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInternetMedical Informatics

Identifiers

PMID23586054
PMCPMC3613081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.