Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23585865›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Reduced crowding and poor contour detection in schizophrenia are consistent with weak surround inhibition.

Valentina Robol, Marc S Tibber, Elaine J Anderson, Tracy Bobin, Patricia Carlin, Sukhwinder S Shergill, Steven C Dakin

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impaired Contour Object Perception in Psychosis.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Impaired contour object perception in psychosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Faster bi-stable visual switching in psychosis.Translational psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Stronger tilt aftereffects in persons with schizophrenia.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Visual Population Receptive Fields in People with Schizophrenia Have Reduced Inhibitory Surrounds.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Shift toward prior knowledge confers a perceptual advantage in early psychosis and psychosis-prone healthy individuals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  16. Schizophrenia and the eye.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina RobolDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. valentina.robol@gmail.com
Marc S Tibber
Elaine J Anderson
Tracy Bobin
Patricia Carlin
Sukhwinder S Shergill
Steven C Dakin
King's College London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901868Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection of visual contours (strings of small oriented elements) is markedly poor in schizophrenia. This has previously been attributed to an inability to group local information across space into a global percept. Here, we show that this failure actually originates from a combination of poor encoding of local orientation and abnormal processing of visual context.

methodsWe measured the ability of observers with schizophrenia to localise contours embedded in backgrounds of differently oriented elements (either randomly oriented, near-parallel or near-perpendicular to the contour). In addition, we measured patients' ability to process local orientation information (i.e., report the orientation of an individual element) for both isolated and crowded elements (i.e., presented with nearby distractors).

resultsWhile patients are poor at detecting contours amongst randomly oriented elements, they are proportionally less disrupted (compared to unaffected controls) when contour and surrounding elements have similar orientations (near-parallel condition). In addition, patients are poor at reporting the orientation of an individual element but, again, are less prone to interference from nearby distractors, a phenomenon known as visual crowding.

conclusionsWe suggest that patients' poor performance at contour perception arises not as a consequence of an "integration deficit" but from a combination of reduced sensitivity to local orientation and abnormalities in contextual processing. We propose that this is a consequence of abnormal gain control, a phenomenon that has been implicated in orientation-selectivity as well as surround suppression.

Indexed as

Form PerceptionInhibition, PsychologicalPattern Recognition, VisualAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrientationPhotic StimulationSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID23585865
PMCPMC3621669
OpenAlexW2079095503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.