ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2013
Mandibular advancement splint as short-term alternative treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea already effectively treated with continuous positive airway pressure.
Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Study to Compare Oral Appliances to Standard CPAP Therapy in Patients With OSAHS, and to Assess Its Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy and Preference Over CPAP for Its Short-term Use.
Adherence and Preference of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Mandibular Advancement Splints in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Randomized Trial
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement splints: the CHOICE multicentre, open-label randomised clinical trial.The European respiratory journal · 2025Trial
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Indications of Different Types of Mandibular Advancement Design for Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: Indications from Literature Review and Case Descriptions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Treatment preferences and willingness to pay in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: relevance of treatment experience.Somnologie : Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin = Somnology : sleep research and sleep medicine · 2022Article
- Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: State of the Art.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Patient-centered care in obstructive sleep apnea: A vision for the future.Sleep medicine reviews · 2018Review
- Perceived Effectiveness, Self-efficacy, and Social Support for Oral Appliance Therapy Among Older Veterans With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Clinical therapeutics · 2016Article
- Innovative treatments for adults with obstructive sleep apnea.Nature and science of sleep · 2014Review
- Preferred treatment.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesCPAP is used as the first-line treatment for patients with severe OSA, but this machine is not always feasible to use on the long term. We performed a clinical trial to determine whether patients with OSA could use a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) as a short-term treatment alternative to CPAP.
methodsTwenty-two patients adherent with CPAP therapy were recruited to the study. Each patient used the MAS for approximately 4 months. The transition between CPAP to MAS was gradual, and patients were asked to start using MAS together with CPAP during the MAS titration until subjective improvement or maximum mandibular advancement was achieved. Sleepiness (ESS), quality of life (SAQLI), and polysomnography were recorded prior to and after MAS titration. Patients recorded CPAP or MAS usage for the following 3 months.
resultsSeven women and 12 men with a mean age of 53.8 (± 12.1) years and mean body mass index of 28.1 (± 4.8) kg/m² completed the clinical trial. Prior to MAS, CPAP adherence was 5.8 h/night. AHI decreased significantly with MAS use compared to baseline (30.7 ± 23.1 vs 13.2 ± 11; p < 0.01). Fourteen patients (74%) had > 50% decrease in their AHI, while 2 patients had an increase in their AHI. There were no significant differences in SAQLI between MAS and CPAP treatment, while ESS decreased significantly on MAS. MAS self-reported usage was correlated with treatment efficacy (r = 0.52; p < 0.05). Seventy-five percent of the patients reported being sufficiently satisfied with MAS to continue to use it as an alternative short-term therapy.
conclusionsMAS partially or completely reduced sleep disordered breathing in the majority of selected, successfully CPAP-treated severe OSA patients. Many patients can probably effectively use MAS as a short-term treatment alternative to CPAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.