Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23585642›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of pharmacotherapy2013

Delivery of optimized inpatient anticoagulation therapy: consensus statement from the anticoagulation forum.

Edith A Nutescu, Ann K Wittkowsky, Allison Burnett, Geno J Merli, Jack E Ansell, David A Garcia

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Role of the anticoagulant monitoring service in 2018: beyond warfarin.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Meaningful use of health information technology and declines in in-hospital adverse drug events.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anticoagulation manager: development of a clinical decision support mobile application for management of anticoagulants.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2016
    Article
  14. Regulatory, legislative, and policy updates with anticoagulant use.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The future of inpatient anticoagulation management.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Edith A NutescuDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. enutescu@uic.edu
Ann K Wittkowsky
Allison Burnett
Geno J Merli
Jack E Ansell
David A Garcia
University of New Mexico · USLenox Hill Hospital · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Anticoagulation Self-Monitoring in Minority Patients.K23HL112908 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI NUTESCU, EDITH · 2013 to 2016
$524k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL112908NHLBI NIH HHS K23HL112908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide recommendations for optimized anticoagulant therapy in the inpatient setting and outline broad elements that need to be in place for effective management of anticoagulant therapy in hospitalized patients; the guidelines are designed to promote optimization of patient clinical outcomes while minimizing the risks for potential anticoagulation-related errors and adverse events. DATA SOURCES: The medical literature was reviewed using MEDLINE (1946-January 2013), EMBASE (1980-January 2013), and PubMed (1947-January 2013) for topics and key words including, but not limited to, standards of practice, national guidelines, patient safety initiatives, and regulatory requirements pertaining to anticoagulant use in the inpatient setting. Non-English-language publications were excluded. Specific MeSH terms used include algorithms, anticoagulants/administration and dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use, clinical protocols/standards, decision support systems, drug monitoring/methods, humans, inpatients, efficiency/ organizational, outcome and process assessment (health care), patient care team/organization and administration, program development/standards, quality improvement/organization and administration, thrombosis/ drug therapy, thrombosis/prevention and control, risk assessment/standards, patient safety/standards, and risk management/methods. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Because of this document's scope, the medical literature was searched using a variety of strategies. When possible, recommendations are supported by available evidence; however, because this paper deals with processes and systems of care, high-quality evidence (eg, controlled trials) is unavailable. In these cases, recommendations represent the consensus opinion of all authors and are endorsed by the Board of Directors of the Anticoagulation Forum, an organization dedicated to optimizing anticoagulation care. The board is composed of physicians, pharmacists, and nurses with demonstrated expertise and experience in the management of patients receiving anticoagulation therapy. DATA SYNTHESIS: Recommendations for delivering optimized inpatient anticoagulation therapy were developed collaboratively by the authors and are summarized in 8 key areas: (1) process, (2) accountability, (3) integration, (4) standards of practice, (5) provider education and competency, (6) patient education, (7) care transitions, and (8) outcomes. Recommendations are intended to inform the development of coordinated care systems containing elements with demonstrated benefit in improvement of anticoagulation therapy outcomes. Recommendations for delivering optimized inpatient anticoagulation therapy are intended to apply to all clinicians involved in the care of hospitalized patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.

conclusionsAnticoagulants are high-risk medications associated with a significant rate of medication errors among hospitalized patients. Several national organizations have introduced initiatives to reduce the likelihood of patient harm associated with the use of anticoagulants. Health care organizations are under increasing pressure to develop systems to ensure the safe and effective use of anticoagulants in the inpatient setting. This document provides consensus guidelines for anticoagulant therapy in the inpatient setting and serves as a companion document to prior guidelines relevant for outpatients.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsInpatientsAnticoagulantsClinical CompetenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInservice TrainingMedication Therapy ManagementPatient Education as TopicPatient TransferPharmacy Service, HospitalPractice Guidelines as TopicAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID23585642
PMCPMC3815430
OpenAlexW2155747282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.