Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23585522›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2013

A multivariate analysis of the relationship between response and survival among patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated within azacitidine or conventional care regimens in the randomized AZA-001 trial.

Steven D Gore, Pierre Fenaux, Valeria Santini, John M Bennett, Lewis R Silverman, John F Seymour, Eva Hellström-Lindberg, Arlene S Swern, Charles L Beach, Alan F List

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01186939 (AZA PH GL 2003 CL 001 - Extension A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Trial of Subcutaneous Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Conventional Care Regimens Plus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01186939 phase3completednot on this map

AZA PH GL 2003 CL 001 - Extension A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Trial of Subcutaneous Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Conventional Care Regimens Plus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCelgeneRan2007 to 2009Enrolled40ConditionsMyelodysplastic SyndromesArmsAzacitidine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The mLeukemia · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Steven D GoreSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA. gorest@jhmi.edu
Pierre Fenaux
Valeria Santini
John M Bennett
Lewis R Silverman
John F Seymour
Eva Hellström-Lindberg
Arlene S Swern
Charles L Beach
Alan F List

Funding

Targeting Epigenomics in Myeloid NeoplasmsK24CA111717 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GORE, STEVEN D · 2005 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA111717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phase III AZA-001 study established that azacitidine significantly improves overall survival compared with conventional care regimens (hazard ratio 0.58 [95% confidence interval 0.43-0.77], P<0.001). This analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between treatment response and overall survival. AZA-001 data were analyzed in a multivariate Cox regression analysis with response as a time-varying covariate. Response categories were "Overall Response" (defined as complete remission, partial remission, or any hematologic improvement) and "Stable Disease" (no complete or partial remission, hematologic improvement, or progression) or "Other" (e.g. disease progression). Achieving an Overall Response with azacitidine reduced risk of death by 95% compared with achieving an Overall Response with the conventional care regimens (hazard ratio 0.05 [95%CI: 0.01-0.43], P=0.006). Sensitivity analyses indicated that significantly improved overall survival remained manifest for patients with a hematologic improvement who had never achieved complete or partial remission (hazard ratio 0.19 [95%CI: 0.08-0.46], P<0.001). Stable Disease in both azacitidine-treated and conventional care-treated patients was also associated with a significantly reduced risk of death (hazard ratio 0.09, [95%CI: 0.06-0.15]; P<0.001). These results demonstrate azacitidine benefit on overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who achieve hematologic response but never attain complete or partial remission, in addition to the survival advantage conferred by achievement of complete or partial remission.

Indexed as

Antimetabolites, AntineoplasticAzacitidineFollow-Up StudiesHumansMultivariate AnalysisMyelodysplastic SyndromesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAzacitidine

Identifiers

PMID23585522
PMCPMC3696610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.