Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23585274›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2013

Accurate detection of differential RNA processing.

Philipp Drewe, Oliver Stegle, Lisa Hartmann, André Kahles, Regina Bohnert, Andreas Wachter, Karsten Borgwardt, Gunnar Rätsch

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Personalized- and one- medicine: bioinformatics foundation in health and its economic feasibility.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Philipp DreweComputational Biology Center, Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. drewe@cbio.mskcc.org
Oliver Stegle
Lisa Hartmann
André Kahles
Regina Bohnert
Andreas Wachter
Karsten Borgwardt
Gunnar Rätsch
Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems · DEFriedrich Miescher Laboratory · DEMax Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DEMax Planck Society · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

MSKCC Center for Translational Cancer Genomic AnalysisU24CA143840 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LADANYI, MARC, SANDER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2016
$11.5M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) has become a vital tool for studying the state of cells in the context of varying environments, genotypes and other factors. RNA-Seq profiling data enable identification of novel isoforms, quantification of known isoforms and detection of changes in transcriptional or RNA-processing activity. Existing approaches to detect differential isoform abundance between samples either require a complete isoform annotation or fall short in providing statistically robust and calibrated significance estimates. Here, we propose a suite of statistical tests to address these open needs: a parametric test that uses known isoform annotations to detect changes in relative isoform abundance and a non-parametric test that detects differential read coverages and can be applied when isoform annotations are not available. Both methods account for the discrete nature of read counts and the inherent biological variability. We demonstrate that these tests compare favorably to previous methods, both in terms of accuracy and statistical calibrations. We use these techniques to analyze RNA-Seq libraries from Arabidopsis thaliana and Drosophila melanogaster. The identified differential RNA processing events were consistent with RT-qPCR measurements and previous studies. The proposed toolkit is available from http://bioweb.me/rdiff and enables in-depth analyses of transcriptomes, with or without available isoform annotation.

Indexed as

RNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalAlgorithmsAnimalsArabidopsisData Interpretation, StatisticalDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression ProfilingMolecular Sequence AnnotationReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA IsoformsRNA Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID23585274
PMCPMC3664801
OpenAlexW2161207752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.