ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2013
Towards the collaborative curation of the registry underlying Identifiers.org.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifiers.org: Compact Identifier services in the cloud.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Community curation of bioinformatics software and data resources.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Article
- A data citation roadmap for scientific publishers.Scientific data · 2018Article
- Uniform resolution of compact identifiers for biomedical data.Scientific data · 2018Article
- Explicit interaction information from WikiPathways in RDF facilitates drug discovery in the Open PHACTS Discovery Platform.F1000Research · 2018Article
- RegenBase: a knowledge base of spinal cord injury biology for translational research.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- BioHackathon series in 2011 and 2012: penetration of ontology and linked data in life science domains.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The MIRIAM Registry (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/miriam/) records information about collections of data in the life sciences, as well as where it can be obtained. This information is used, in combination with the resolving infrastructure of Identifiers.org (http://identifiers.org/), to generate globally unique identifiers, in the form of Uniform Resource Identifier. These identifiers are now widely used to provide perennial cross-references and annotations. The growing demand for these identifiers results in a significant increase in curational efforts to maintain the underlying registry. This requires the design and implementation of an economically viable and sustainable solution able to cope with such expansion. We briefly describe the Registry, the current curation duties entailed, and our plans to extend and distribute this workload through collaborative and community efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.