ArticleJournal of medical systems2013
Open issues in intelligent personal health record--an updated status report for 2012.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Health Record Systems Scope and Functionalities: Literature Review and Future Directions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Review
- Mobile PHRs compliance with Android and iOS usability guidelines.Journal of medical systems · 2014Article
- A roadmap for designing a personalized search tool for individual healthcare providers.Journal of medical systems · 2014Article
- Free Web-based personal health records: an analysis of functionality.Journal of medical systems · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve the capability and usability of the personal health record (PHR) as a tool to empower consumers in the management of their own health, we have proposed the concept of an intelligent PHR (iPHR) and built a prototype iPHR system with four functions. These four functions use various health knowledge and computer science techniques to automatically provide users with personalized healthcare information to facilitate their well-being. This paper discusses several open issues in iPHR, including two enhancements to an existing function and two potential new functions. The two enhancements are for automatically compiling relevant self-care activities for each health issue and automatically identifying contraindicated self-care activities, respectively. One potential new function is personalized search for individual healthcare providers. Another potential new function is personalized local search for health-related services to help maintain patients in their homes. We include some preliminary thoughts on how to address these open issues with the hope to stimulate future research work on iPHR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23584758What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.