ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2013
Diffusion of antipsychotics in the US And French markets, 1998-2008.
Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- National trends in metabolic risk of psychiatric inpatients in the United States during the atypical antipsychotic era.Schizophrenia research · 2022Article
- A Retrospective Cohort Study of Acute Kidney Injury Risk Associated with Antipsychotics.CNS drugs · 2017Article
- A Review of Adverse Outcomes Associated with Psychoactive Drug Use in Nursing Home Residents with Dementia.Drugs & aging · 2016Review
- Diabetes and Cardiovascular Care Among People with Severe Mental Illness: A Literature Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Review
- Regional Variation in Physician Adoption of Antipsychotics: Impact on US Medicare Expenditures.The journal of mental health policy and economics · 2016Article
- Antipsychotic prescribing in youths: a French community-based study from 2006 to 2013.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2015Article
- Health Care Utilization and Treatment Persistence Associated with Oral Paliperidone and Lurasidone in Schizophrenia Treatment.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2015Article
- Comparison of health services use associated with ziprasidone and olanzapine among schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients in the USA.Clinical drug investigation · 2014Article
- Trends in use of antipsychotics in elderly patients with dementia: Impact of national safety warnings.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSecond-generation antipsychotics captured most of the U.S. antipsychotic market shortly after their introduction. Little is known about how second-generation antipsychotics have diffused in other countries with different health systems. The study objective was to describe trends in antipsychotic use in the United States and France from 1998 to 2008.
methodsPharmaceutical policies in France and the United States are briefly described, followed by descriptive data on quarterly prescriptions for oral antipsychotics dispensed between January 1998 and September 2008. Data are from Xponent for the United States and the GERS database for France. Trends in the use of first- versus second-generation antipsychotics and in ingredient formulations of second-generation antipsychotics used are reported.
resultsBetween 1998 and 2008, total antipsychotic use in the United States increased by 78%. Total use in France was consistently higher despite a 9% decrease during the period. By 2008, second-generation antipsychotics represented 86% of the antipsychotics sold in the U.S. market, versus only 40% of the French market. However, average annual growth rates in use of second-generation antipsychotics were similar in the two countries. In France, use of all but one second-generation antipsychotic steadily increased, whereas in the United States trends in the use of newer drugs varied substantially by drug. For example, use of olanzapine decreased after 2003, but use of quetiapine increased.
conclusionsThese results highlight markedly divergent trends in the diffusion of new antipsychotics in France and the United States. Some differences may be explained by differences in health systems; others may reflect physicians' preferences and norms of practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.