Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23584346›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2013

Using NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology to measure the quality of colorectal cancer care in the veterans health administration.

George L Jackson, Leah L Zullig, S Yousuf Zafar, Adam A Powell, Diana L Ordin, Ziad F Gellad, David Abbott, James M Schlosser, Janis Hersh, Dawn Provenzale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association of Adherence to Quality Metrics with Recurrence or Mortality among Veterans with Colorectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

George L JacksonDurham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA. george.l.jackson@duke.edu
Leah L Zullig
S Yousuf Zafar
Adam A Powell
Diana L Ordin
Ziad F Gellad
David Abbott
James M Schlosser
Janis Hersh
Dawn Provenzale

Funding

DUKE TRAINING GRANT IN DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND NUTRITIONT32DK007568 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine Garman, Rodger A. Liddle · 1988 to 2026
$5.6M
Cancer Training GrantR25CA116339 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BASCH, ETHAN M., REEVE, BRYCE B · 2008 to 2017
$4.0M
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPT32HS000079 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, DAVID · 1998 to 2013
$1.9M
GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER SCREENING AND SURVEILLANCEK24DK002926 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PROVENZALE, DAWN T · 2000 to 2009
$1.1M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000079HSRD VA CDA 08-024HSRD VA IK2 HX001345NCI NIH HHS 5R25CA116339NCI NIH HHS R25 CA116339NCI NIH HHS YI-PC-6039-01NIDDK NIH HHS 5 K24 DK002926NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK002926NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007568NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007568-17PHS HHS V246S-00054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines can be used to help develop measures of quality of cancer care. This article describes the use of a Cancer Care Quality Measurement System (CCQMS) to monitor these measures for colorectal cancer in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The CCQMS assessed practice guideline concordance primarily based on colon (14 indicators) and rectal (11 indicators) cancer care guidelines of the NCCN. Indicators were developed with input from VHA stakeholders with the goal of examining the continuum of diagnosis, neoadjuvant therapy, surgery, adjuvant therapy, and survivorship surveillance and/or end-of-life care. In addition, 9 measures of timeliness of cancer care were developed. The measures/indicators formed the basis of a computerized data abstraction tool that produced reports on quality of care in real-time as data were entered. The tool was developed for a 28-facility learning collaborative, the Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative (C4), aimed at improving colorectal cancer (CRC) care quality. Data on 1373 incident stage I-IV CRC cases were entered over approximately 18 months and were used to target and monitor quality improvement activities. The primary opportunity for improvement involved surveillance colonoscopy and services in patients after curative-intent treatment. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology were successfully used to develop a measurement system for a VHA research-operations quality improvement partnership.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of Health CareAccreditationColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans Health

Identifiers

PMID23584346
PMCPMC3712652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.