Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23584334›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2013

Using space-based investigations to inform cancer research on Earth.

Jeanne L Becker, Glauco R Souza

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Targeted Cancer Therapy-on-A-Chip.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Omics Studies of Tumor Cells under Microgravity Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeanne L BeckerNano3D Biosciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA. jbecker@n3dbio.com
Glauco R Souza
Nano3D Biosciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiments conducted in the microgravity environment of space are not typically at the forefront of the mind of a cancer biologist. However, space provides physical conditions that are not achievable on Earth, as well as conditions that can be exploited to study mechanisms and pathways that control cell growth and function. Over the past four decades, studies have shown how exposure to microgravity alters biological processes that may be relevant to cancer. In this Review, we explore the influence of microgravity on cell biology, focusing on tumour cells grown in space together with work carried out using models in ground-based investigations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Culture TechniquesCoculture TechniquesDrug CompoundingHumansNeoplasmsPhototherapySpacecraftWeightlessnessAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23584334
OpenAlexW1997866086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.