Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23584298›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2013

Clinical and biomarker outcomes of the phase II vandetanib study from the BATTLE trial.

Anne S Tsao, Suyu Liu, J Jack Lee, Christine M Alden, George R Blumenschein, Roy Herbst, Suzanne E Davis, Edward Kim, Scott Lippman, John Heymach and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Multiple mutations in theTranslational lung cancer research · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne S TsaoDepartment of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas 7030, USA. astsao@mdanderson.org
Suyu Liu
J Jack Lee
Christine M Alden
George R Blumenschein
Roy Herbst
Suzanne E Davis
Edward Kim
Scott Lippman
John Heymach
Hai Tran
XiMing Tang
Ignacio Wistuba
Waun Ki Hong
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS--SPORE IN LUNG CANCERP50CA070907 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GIBBONS, DON LYNN · 1996 to 2024
$57.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA070907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Biomarker-integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination trial prospectively obtained serum and tumor core biopsies and randomized 255 chemorefractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients into four phase II trials: erlotinib, erlotinib-bexarotene, vandetanib, or sorafenib. Herein, we report the clinical and biomarker results of the phase II vandetanib trial.

resultsFifty-four patients received vandetanib. The 8-week disease control rate was 33%, median progression-free survival (PFS) 1.81 months, and median overall survival (OS) 6.5 months. No demographic subgroups had PFS or OS benefit. Eight patients with EGFR mutations had a trend for higher 8-week disease control rate (63% versus 31%; p = 0.12) but worse OS (5.9 months versus 9 months; p = 0.8). Patients with EGFR gene amplification (n = 6) had a worse OS (3.9 months versus 9.5 months; p = 0.04). KRAS mutation patients (3.9 months versus 9.5 months; p = 0.23) also had a worse OS. For the serum biomarker analysis, patients with below the median serum expression of interleukin 9c (p = 0.019) and eotaxin (p = 0.007) had a shorter PFS. A trend toward a shorter PFS was also seen in patients with higher than the median neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (p = 0.079) and lower than the median TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (p = 0.087).

conclusionOur trial results are largely consistent with the literature in unselected pretreated NSCLC patients. Although vandetanib improved median PFS in EGFR mutation patients with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistance compared with EGFR wild-type, there was no OS advantage. Although vandetanib is no longer in development in NSCLC, identification of a molecular phenotype that responds to dual epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibition would contribute to the field.

Indexed as

Acute-Phase ProteinsAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene AmplificationGenes, erbB-1HumansInterleukin-9Kaplan-Meier EstimateLipocalin-2LipocalinsLung NeoplasmsMaleAcute-Phase ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorInterleukin-9KRAS protein, humanLCN2 protein, humanLipocalin-2LipocalinsPiperidinesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Quinazolinesras ProteinsTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligandvandetanib

Identifiers

PMID23584298
PMCPMC5118909
OpenAlexW2154377120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.