Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23584253›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Vaccine hesitancy: an overview.

Eve Dubé, Caroline Laberge, Maryse Guay, Paul Bramadat, Réal Roy, Julie Bettinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,103 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,103citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,103 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,043 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eve DubéCentre de recherche du CHU de Québec; Québec, QC Canada; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ); Québec, QC Canada; Université Laval; Québec City, QC Canada.
Caroline Laberge
Maryse Guay
Paul Bramadat
Réal Roy
Julie Bettinger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being recognized as one of the most successful public health measures, vaccination is perceived as unsafe and unnecessary by a growing number of individuals. Lack of confidence in vaccines is now considered a threat to the success of vaccination programs. Vaccine hesitancy is believed to be responsible for decreasing vaccine coverage and an increasing risk of vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks and epidemics. This review provides an overview of the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy. First, we will characterize vaccine hesitancy and suggest the possible causes of the apparent increase in vaccine hesitancy in the developed world. Then we will look at determinants of individual decision-making about vaccination.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeCommunicable DiseasesHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareRisk AssessmentVaccinationVaccinesVaccinesdecision-makingpsychosocial factorsreviewsocio-cultural factorsvaccinationvaccine-hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID23584253
PMCPMC3906279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.