Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23584132›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

Predictors of response to palliative care intervention for chronic nausea in advanced cancer outpatients.

Wadih Rhondali, Sriram Yennurajalingam, Gary Chisholm, Jeanette Ferrer, Sun Hyun Kim, Jung Hun Kang, Marilene Filbet, Eduardo Bruera

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Wadih RhondaliDepartment of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, Unit 141, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Sriram Yennurajalingam
Gary Chisholm
Jeanette Ferrer
Sun Hyun Kim
Jung Hun Kang
Marilene Filbet
Eduardo Bruera
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USGyeongsang National University · KRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRMyongji Hospital · KR

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Methylphenidate for Fatigue in Advanced Cancer PatientsR01NR010162 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BRUERA, EDUARDO · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
Morphine versus Methadone as First Line Strong Opioid for Cancer PainR01CA124481 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BRUERA, EDUARDO · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA 016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01CA1222292.01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124481NCI NIH HHS R01CA124481-01NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010162NINR NIH HHS R01NR010162-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNausea is a frequent and distressing symptom in advanced cancer patients. The objective of this retrospective study was to determine predictors of response to palliative care consultation for chronic nausea in advanced cancer outpatients.

methodsEligible patients included were outpatient supportive care center seen consecutively for an initial consultation and who had one follow-up visit within 30 days of the initial consultation. We reviewed the medical records of 1,273 consecutive patients, and 444 (35 %) were found to meet the eligibility criteria. All patients were assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Nausea response was defined as an improvement of at least 30% between the initial visit and the first follow-up. We used logistic regression models to assess the possible predictors of improvement in nausea.

resultsOverall, 112 of 444 patients (25%) experienced moderate/severe chronic nausea (ESAS item score ≥4/10). Higher baseline nausea intensity was significantly related to constipation (r = 0.158; p = 0.046) and all the symptoms assessed by the ESAS (p < 0.001). Sixty-eight of the 112 (61%) patients with moderate/severe nausea at baseline showed a significant improvement at the follow-up visit (p < 0.001). The main predictors for nausea response were improvement of fatigue (p = 0.005) and increased appetite (p = 0.003).

conclusionsBaseline nausea was associated with all the ESAS symptom and improvement of fatigue and lack of appetite predicted a lower frequency of nausea at follow-up. More research is necessary to better understand the association between nausea severity and other symptoms and to predict which interventions will yield the best outcomes depending on the mix and severity of symptoms.

Indexed as

AgedAmbulatory CareAnalgesics, OpioidAntiemeticsChronic DiseaseFatigueFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaxativesLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNauseaNeoplasmsOutpatientsAnalgesics, OpioidAntiemeticsLaxatives

Identifiers

PMID23584132
PMCPMC3895156
OpenAlexW2112063192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.